The prevalence and outcomes of frail older adults in clinical trials in multiple myeloma: A systematic review

Hira Mian, Arleigh McCurdy, Smith Giri, Shakira Grant, Bram Rochwerg, Erica Winks, Ashley E. Rosko, Monika Engelhardt, Charlotte Pawlyn, Gordon Cook, Graham Jackson, Sara Bringhen, Thierry Facon, Alessandra Larocca, Sonja Zweegman, Tanya M. Wildes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable blood cancer that primarily affects older adults. Several frailty tools have been developed to address the heterogeneity of aging in this population. Uptake of these measures has been variable, leading to a gap in knowledge regarding the proportion of enrolled trial participants considered frail and uncertainty in the treatment-related effects and outcomes among this high-risk population. We performed a systematic review of therapeutic interventional MM clinical trials reporting on frailty. We included 43 clinical trials (24 randomized controlled trials and 19 non-randomized trials) which met eligibility criteria. Frailty was increasingly incorporated in studies in more recent years with 41.9% of included studies being reported in the last two years. Commonly used frailty tools included the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) frailty index (41.8%), and the simplified frailty score (39.5%). Frailty status was categorized with 3 levels as (frail, intermediate fit, or fit) in 51.2% of the studies and dichotomized (frail, non-frail) in 18.6% of studies. Frailty prevalence greatly varied across trials ranging from 17.2% to 73.6% of the cohort. Of the included studies, 72.0% conducted subgroup analysis (planned or post-hoc) based on frailty status. Most studies demonstrated a consistent benefit of MM interventions among the frail and non-frail populations, however in general, frail patients had worse outcomes compared to the fit. Although frailty is increasingly being incorporated in MM clinical trials, due to the variation in both the definition and categorization of frailty, there remains heterogeneity in the prevalence of frailty and its potential associated impact on outcomes.
Original languageEnglish
Article number6
JournalBlood Cancer Journal
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2023

Cite this