The Tenacious Goal Pursuit and Flexible Goal Adjustment Scales: A Validation Study

Inge Henselmans; Joke Fleer; Eric van Sonderen; Ans Smink; Robbert Sanderman; Adelita V. Ranchor

doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021536

The Tenacious Goal Pursuit and Flexible Goal Adjustment Scales: A Validation Study

Inge Henselmans, Joke Fleer, Eric van Sonderen, Ans Smink, Robbert Sanderman, Adelita V. Ranchor

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The flexible goal adjustment (FLEX) and tenacious goal pursuit (TEN) scales are used regularly in aging research. The current study examined their validity in a sample of 517 women (30-75 years) in multiple ways. Overall, the findings show that the scales do not clearly distinguish between FLEX and TEN. The direction in which the items were formulated was just as important as what was being measured. Moreover, face validity of the inversely phrased items in particular appeared to be weak. On the basis of these findings, the authors recommend a revision of the concept definitions as well as of the items.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	174-180
Number of pages	7
Journal	Psychology and Aging
Volume	26
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021536
Publication status	Published - Mar 2011

Keywords

Confirmatory factor analysis
Goals
Psychological adaptation
Self-regulation
Validity

Access to Document

https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021536

Cite this

@article{555a789460344572993d75e0967e3e98,

title = "The Tenacious Goal Pursuit and Flexible Goal Adjustment Scales: A Validation Study",

abstract = "The flexible goal adjustment (FLEX) and tenacious goal pursuit (TEN) scales are used regularly in aging research. The current study examined their validity in a sample of 517 women (30-75 years) in multiple ways. Overall, the findings show that the scales do not clearly distinguish between FLEX and TEN. The direction in which the items were formulated was just as important as what was being measured. Moreover, face validity of the inversely phrased items in particular appeared to be weak. On the basis of these findings, the authors recommend a revision of the concept definitions as well as of the items.",

keywords = "Confirmatory factor analysis, Goals, Psychological adaptation, Self-regulation, Validity",

author = "Inge Henselmans and Joke Fleer and {van Sonderen}, Eric and Ans Smink and Robbert Sanderman and Ranchor, {Adelita V.}",

year = "2011",

month = mar,

doi = "https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021536",

language = "English",

volume = "26",

pages = "174--180",

journal = "Psychology and Aging",

issn = "0882-7974",

publisher = "American Psychological Association",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Tenacious Goal Pursuit and Flexible Goal Adjustment Scales

T2 - A Validation Study

AU - Henselmans, Inge

AU - Fleer, Joke

AU - van Sonderen, Eric

AU - Smink, Ans

AU - Sanderman, Robbert

AU - Ranchor, Adelita V.

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - The flexible goal adjustment (FLEX) and tenacious goal pursuit (TEN) scales are used regularly in aging research. The current study examined their validity in a sample of 517 women (30-75 years) in multiple ways. Overall, the findings show that the scales do not clearly distinguish between FLEX and TEN. The direction in which the items were formulated was just as important as what was being measured. Moreover, face validity of the inversely phrased items in particular appeared to be weak. On the basis of these findings, the authors recommend a revision of the concept definitions as well as of the items.

AB - The flexible goal adjustment (FLEX) and tenacious goal pursuit (TEN) scales are used regularly in aging research. The current study examined their validity in a sample of 517 women (30-75 years) in multiple ways. Overall, the findings show that the scales do not clearly distinguish between FLEX and TEN. The direction in which the items were formulated was just as important as what was being measured. Moreover, face validity of the inversely phrased items in particular appeared to be weak. On the basis of these findings, the authors recommend a revision of the concept definitions as well as of the items.

KW - Confirmatory factor analysis

KW - Goals

KW - Psychological adaptation

KW - Self-regulation

KW - Validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79953150596&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021536

DO - https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021536

M3 - Article

C2 - 21299305

SN - 0882-7974

VL - 26

SP - 174

EP - 180

JO - Psychology and Aging

JF - Psychology and Aging

IS - 1

ER -

The Tenacious Goal Pursuit and Flexible Goal Adjustment Scales: A Validation Study

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this