Tranexamic Acid After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Post-Hoc Analysis of the ULTRA Trial: Post-Hoc Analysis of the ULTRA Trial

Maud A. Tjerkstra, René Post, Menno R. Germans, Mervyn D.I. Vergouwen, Korné Jellema, Radboud W. Koot, Nyika D. Kruyt, Peter W.A. Willems, Jasper F.C. Wolfs, Frits C. De Beer, Hans Kieft, Dharmin Nanda, Bram Van Der Pol, Gerwin Roks, Frank De Beer, Patricia H.A. Halkes, Loes J.A. Reichman, Paul J.A.M. Brouwers, Renske M. Van Den Berg-Vos, Vincent I.H. KwaTaco C. Van Der Ree, Irene Bronner, Henri P. Bienfait, Hieronymus Boogaarts, Catharina J.M. Klijn, René Van Den Berg, Bert A. Coert, Janneke Horn, Charles B.L.M. Majoie, Gabriël J.E. Rinkel, Yvo B.W.M. Roos, W. Peter Vandertop, Dagmar Verbaan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and objectives: The ULTRA-trial showed that ultra-early and short-term tranexamic acid treatment after subarachnoid hemorrhage did not improve clinical outcome at six months. An expected proportion of the included patients had non-aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage In this post-hoc study, we will investigate whether ultra-early and short-term tranexamic acid treatment in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage improves clinical outcome at six months.

Methods: The ULTRA-trial is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label trial with blinded outcome assessment, conducted between July 24, 2013 and January 20, 2020. After confirmation of subarachnoid hemorrhage on non-contrast computer tomography, patients were allocated to either ultra-early and short-term tranexamic acid treatment with usual care, or usual care only. In this post-hoc analysis, we included all ULTRA-participants with a confirmed aneurysm on CT angiography and/or digital subtraction angiography. The primary endpoint was clinical outcome at six months, assessed by the modified Rankin Scale, dichotomized into good (0-3) and poor (4-6) outcome.

Results: Of the 813 ULTRA-trial patients who had an aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, 409 (50%) were assigned to the tranexamic acid group and 404 (50%) to the control group. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 233 of 405 (58%) patients in the tranexamic acid group and 238 of 399 (60%) patients in the control group had a good clinical outcome (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0·92; 95% confidence interval (C.I.) 0·69 to 1·24). None of the secondary outcomes showed significant differences between the treatment groups: excellent clinical outcome (mRS 0-2) aOR 0.76, 95% C.I. 0.57-1.03, all-cause mortality at 30 days aOR 0.91, 95% C.I. 0.65-1.28), all-cause mortality at six months aOR 1.10 (95% C.I. 0.80-1.52).

Discussion: Ultra-early and short-term tranexamic acid treatment did not improve clinical outcome at six months in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and therefore, cannot be recommended.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02684812; submission date February 18, 2016, first patient enrollment on July 24th, 2013).

Classification of evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that tranexamic acid does not improve outcomes in patients presenting with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)E2605-E2614
JournalNeurology
Volume99
Issue number23
Early online date20 Oct 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Oct 2022

Cite this