TY - JOUR
T1 - Tumor-positive peritoneal cytology in patients with gastric cancer is associated with poor outcome
T2 - A nationwide study
AU - van der Sluis, Karen
AU - Taylor, Steven N.
AU - Kodach, Liudmila L.
AU - van Dieren, Jolanda M.
AU - de Hingh, Ignace H. J. T.
AU - Wijnhoven, Bas P. L.
AU - Verhoeven, Rob H. A.
AU - Vollebergh, Marieke A.
AU - van Sandick, Johanna W.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2024/3/1
Y1 - 2024/3/1
N2 - Background: The clinical significance of tumor-positive peritoneal cytology (CYT+) in gastric cancer (GC) patients is unclear. This nationwide cohort study aimed to i) assess the frequency of cytological analysis at staging laparoscopy; ii) determine the prevalence of CYT+GC; and iii) compare overall survival (OS) in CYT+ patients versus those with (PM+) and those without (PM-) macroscopic peritoneal disease. Methods: All patients diagnosed with cT1–4, cN0–2 and M0 or synchronous PM GC between 2016–2021 were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry database and linked to the nationwide pathology database. Results: A total of 4397 patients was included, of which 40 % underwent cytological assessment following staging laparoscopy (863/1745). The prevalence of CYT+ was 8 %. A total of 69 patients had CYT+(1.6 %), 789 (17.9 %) had PM+ and 3539 (80.5 %) had PM- disease. Hazard ratio for OS in CYT+ versus PM+ was 0.86 (95 %CI 0.64–1.17, p-value=0.338), and in PM- versus PM+0.43 (95 %CI 0.38–0.49, p-value<0.001). No survival difference was found between systemic chemotherapy versus surgical resection in CYT+ patients. Discussion: In this nationwide study, OS for gastric cancer patients with CYT+ was equally unfavorable as for those with PM+ and significantly worse as compared to those with PM-. The optimal treatment strategy has yet to be established.
AB - Background: The clinical significance of tumor-positive peritoneal cytology (CYT+) in gastric cancer (GC) patients is unclear. This nationwide cohort study aimed to i) assess the frequency of cytological analysis at staging laparoscopy; ii) determine the prevalence of CYT+GC; and iii) compare overall survival (OS) in CYT+ patients versus those with (PM+) and those without (PM-) macroscopic peritoneal disease. Methods: All patients diagnosed with cT1–4, cN0–2 and M0 or synchronous PM GC between 2016–2021 were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry database and linked to the nationwide pathology database. Results: A total of 4397 patients was included, of which 40 % underwent cytological assessment following staging laparoscopy (863/1745). The prevalence of CYT+ was 8 %. A total of 69 patients had CYT+(1.6 %), 789 (17.9 %) had PM+ and 3539 (80.5 %) had PM- disease. Hazard ratio for OS in CYT+ versus PM+ was 0.86 (95 %CI 0.64–1.17, p-value=0.338), and in PM- versus PM+0.43 (95 %CI 0.38–0.49, p-value<0.001). No survival difference was found between systemic chemotherapy versus surgical resection in CYT+ patients. Discussion: In this nationwide study, OS for gastric cancer patients with CYT+ was equally unfavorable as for those with PM+ and significantly worse as compared to those with PM-. The optimal treatment strategy has yet to be established.
KW - Cytology
KW - Gastric cancer
KW - Lavage
KW - Peritoneal metastases
KW - Staging laparoscopy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85182877150&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2024.113541
DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2024.113541
M3 - Article
C2 - 38237371
SN - 0959-8049
VL - 199
JO - European Journal of Cancer
JF - European Journal of Cancer
M1 - 113541
ER -