TY - JOUR
T1 - Use of intravenous iron and risk of anaphylaxis
T2 - A multinational observational post-authorisation safety study in Europe
AU - Fortuny, Joan
AU - von Gersdorff, Gero
AU - Lassalle, R. gis
AU - Linder, Marie
AU - Overbeek, Jetty
AU - Reinold, Jonas
AU - Toft, Gunnar
AU - Timmer, Antje
AU - Dress, Jochen
AU - Blin, Patrick
AU - Droz-Perroteau, C. cile
AU - Ehrenstein, Vera
AU - Franzoni, Carla
AU - Herings, Ron
AU - Kollhorst, Bianca
AU - Moore, Nicholas
AU - Odsbu, Ingvild
AU - Perez-Gutthann, Susana
AU - Schink, Tania
AU - Rascher, Katherine
AU - Rasouliyan, Lawrence
AU - Rothman, Kenneth J.
AU - Saigi-Morgui, Nuria
AU - Schaller, Mathias
AU - Smits, Elisabeth
AU - Forstner, Michael
AU - Bénichou, Jacques
AU - Bircher, Andreas J.
AU - Garbe, Edeltraut
AU - Intravenous Iron Consortium
AU - Rampton, David S.
AU - Gutierrez, Lia
N1 - Fortuny, Joan von Gersdorff, Gero Lassalle, Regis Linder, Marie Overbeek, Jetty Reinold, Jonas Toft, Gunnar Timmer, Antje Dress, Jochen Blin, Patrick Droz-Perroteau, Cecile Ehrenstein, Vera Franzoni, Carla Herings, Ron Kollhorst, Bianca Moore, Nicholas Odsbu, Ingvild Perez-Gutthann, Susana Schink, Tania Rascher, Katherine Rasouliyan, Lawrence Rothman, Kenneth J Saigi-Morgui, Nuria Schaller, Mathias Smits, Elisabeth Forstner, Michael Benichou, Jacques Bircher, Andreas J Garbe, Edeltraut Rampton, David S Gutierrez, Lia eng Observational Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2021 Oct;30(10):1447-1457. doi: 10.1002/pds.5319. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
PY - 2021/10/1
Y1 - 2021/10/1
N2 - Purpose: This post-authorisation safety study estimated the risk of anaphylaxis in patients receiving intravenous (IV) iron in Europe, with interest in iron dextran and iron non-dextrans. Studies conducted in the United States have reported risk of anaphylaxis to IV iron ranging from 2.0 to 6.8 per 10 000 first treatments. Methods: Cohort study of IV iron new users, captured mostly through pharmacy ambulatory dispensing, from populations covered by health and administrative data sources in five European countries from 1999 to 2017. Anaphylaxis events were identified through an algorithm that used parenteral penicillin as a positive control. Results: A total of 304 210 patients with a first IV iron treatment (6367 iron dextran), among whom 13–16 anaphylaxis cases were identified and reported as a range to comply with data protection regulations. The pooled unadjusted incidence proportion (IP) ranged from 0.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2–0.9) to 0.5 (95% CI, 0.3–1.0) per 10 000 first treatments. No events were identified at first dextran treatments. There were 231 294 first penicillin treatments with 30 potential cases of anaphylaxis (IP = 1.2; 95% CI, 0.8–1.7 per 10 000 treatments). Conclusion: We found an IP of anaphylaxis from 0.4 to 0.5 per 10 000 first IV iron treatments. The study captured only a fraction of IV iron treatments administered in hospitals, where most first treatments are likely to happen. Due to this limitation, the study could not exclude a differential risk of anaphylaxis between iron dextran and iron non-dextrans. The IP of anaphylaxis in users of penicillin was consistent with incidences reported in the literature.
AB - Purpose: This post-authorisation safety study estimated the risk of anaphylaxis in patients receiving intravenous (IV) iron in Europe, with interest in iron dextran and iron non-dextrans. Studies conducted in the United States have reported risk of anaphylaxis to IV iron ranging from 2.0 to 6.8 per 10 000 first treatments. Methods: Cohort study of IV iron new users, captured mostly through pharmacy ambulatory dispensing, from populations covered by health and administrative data sources in five European countries from 1999 to 2017. Anaphylaxis events were identified through an algorithm that used parenteral penicillin as a positive control. Results: A total of 304 210 patients with a first IV iron treatment (6367 iron dextran), among whom 13–16 anaphylaxis cases were identified and reported as a range to comply with data protection regulations. The pooled unadjusted incidence proportion (IP) ranged from 0.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2–0.9) to 0.5 (95% CI, 0.3–1.0) per 10 000 first treatments. No events were identified at first dextran treatments. There were 231 294 first penicillin treatments with 30 potential cases of anaphylaxis (IP = 1.2; 95% CI, 0.8–1.7 per 10 000 treatments). Conclusion: We found an IP of anaphylaxis from 0.4 to 0.5 per 10 000 first IV iron treatments. The study captured only a fraction of IV iron treatments administered in hospitals, where most first treatments are likely to happen. Due to this limitation, the study could not exclude a differential risk of anaphylaxis between iron dextran and iron non-dextrans. The IP of anaphylaxis in users of penicillin was consistent with incidences reported in the literature.
KW - Administration, Intravenous Anaphylaxis/chemically induced/epidemiology Cohort Studies Europe/epidemiology Humans Iron IV iron anaphylaxis cohort study dextran multidatabase severe hypersensitivity reactions
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85111470856&origin=inward
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34181291
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.5319
DO - https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.5319
M3 - Article
C2 - 34181291
SN - 1099-1557
VL - 30
SP - 1447
EP - 1457
JO - Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety
JF - Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety
IS - 10
ER -