TY - JOUR
T1 - Usefulness of the updated logistic clinical SYNTAX score after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Insights from the GLOBAL LEADERS trial
AU - GLOBAL LEADERS Trial Investigators
AU - Hara, Hironori
AU - Kogame, Norihiro
AU - Takahashi, Kuniaki
AU - Modolo, Rodrigo
AU - Chichareon, Ply
AU - Tomaniak, Mariusz
AU - Ono, Masafumi
AU - Kawashima, Hideyuki
AU - Gao, Chao
AU - Wang, Rutao
AU - Valkov, Veselin D.
AU - vom Dahl, J. rgen
AU - Steinwender, Clemens
AU - Geisler, Tobias
AU - Lemos Neto, Pedro Alves
AU - Macaya Miguel, Carlos
AU - Garg, Scot
AU - Jüni, Peter
AU - Hamm, Christian
AU - Steg, Philippe Gabriel
AU - Valgimigli, Marco
AU - Vranckx, Pascal
AU - Windecker, Stephan
AU - Farooq, Vasim
AU - Onuma, Yoshinobu
AU - Serruys, Patrick W.
PY - 2020/11/1
Y1 - 2020/11/1
N2 - Objectives: We aimed to investigate the prognostic utility of the anatomical CABG SYNTAX and logistic clinical SYNTAX scores for mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG). Background: The anatomical SYNTAX score evaluated the anatomical complexity of coronary artery disease and helped predict the prognosis of patients undergoing PCI. The anatomical CABG SYNTAX score was derived from the anatomical SYNTAX score in patients with prior CABG, whilst the logistic clinical SYNTAX score was developed by incorporating clinical factors into the anatomical SYNTAX score. Methods: We calculated the anatomical CABG SYNTAX score and logistic clinical SYNTAX score in 205 patients in the GLOBAL LEADERS trial. The predictive abilities of these scores for 2-year all-cause mortality were evaluated. Results: Using the median scores as categorical thresholds between low and high score groups, the logistic clinical SYNTAX score was able to discriminate the risk of 2-year mortality, unlike the anatomical CABG SYNTAX score. The logistic clinical SYNTAX was significantly better at predicting 2-year mortality, compared to the anatomical CABG SYNTAX score, as evidenced by AUC values in receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis (0.806 vs. 0.582, p <.001) and integrated discrimination improvement (0.121, p <.001). Conclusions: The logistic clinical SYNTAX score was superior to the anatomical CABG SYNTAX score in predicting 2-year mortality.
AB - Objectives: We aimed to investigate the prognostic utility of the anatomical CABG SYNTAX and logistic clinical SYNTAX scores for mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG). Background: The anatomical SYNTAX score evaluated the anatomical complexity of coronary artery disease and helped predict the prognosis of patients undergoing PCI. The anatomical CABG SYNTAX score was derived from the anatomical SYNTAX score in patients with prior CABG, whilst the logistic clinical SYNTAX score was developed by incorporating clinical factors into the anatomical SYNTAX score. Methods: We calculated the anatomical CABG SYNTAX score and logistic clinical SYNTAX score in 205 patients in the GLOBAL LEADERS trial. The predictive abilities of these scores for 2-year all-cause mortality were evaluated. Results: Using the median scores as categorical thresholds between low and high score groups, the logistic clinical SYNTAX score was able to discriminate the risk of 2-year mortality, unlike the anatomical CABG SYNTAX score. The logistic clinical SYNTAX was significantly better at predicting 2-year mortality, compared to the anatomical CABG SYNTAX score, as evidenced by AUC values in receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis (0.806 vs. 0.582, p <.001) and integrated discrimination improvement (0.121, p <.001). Conclusions: The logistic clinical SYNTAX score was superior to the anatomical CABG SYNTAX score in predicting 2-year mortality.
KW - coronary bypass grafts
KW - drug eluting
KW - percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
KW - risk stratification
KW - stent
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85083451660&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28898
DO - https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28898
M3 - Article
C2 - 32294317
SN - 1522-1946
VL - 96
SP - E516-E526
JO - Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions
JF - Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions
IS - 5
ER -