Virtual unenhanced dual-energy computed tomography for photon radiotherapy: The effect on dose distribution and cone-beam computed tomography based position verification

Maryam Afifah, Marloes C. Bulthuis, Karin N. Goudschaal, Jolanda M. Verbeek-Spijkerman, Tezontl S. Rosario, Duncan den Boer, Karel A. Hinnen, Arjan Bel, Zdenko van Kesteren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Virtual Unenhanced images (VUE) from contrast-enhanced dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) eliminate manual suppression of contrast-enhanced structures (CES) or pre-contrast scans. CT intensity decreases in high-density structures outside the CES following VUE algorithm application. This study assesses VUE's impact on the radiotherapy workflow of gynecological tumors, comparing dose distribution and cone-beam CT-based (CBCT) position verification to contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) images. Materials and Methods: A total of 14 gynecological patients with contrast-enhanced CT simulation were included. Two CT images were reconstructed: CECT and VUE. Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) plans generated on CECT were recalculated on VUE using both the CECT lookup table (LUT) and a dedicated VUE LUT. Gamma analysis assessed 3D dose distributions. CECT and VUE images were retrospectively registered to daily CBCT using Chamfer matching algorithm. Results: Planning target volume (PTV) dose agreement with CECT was within 0.35% for D2%, Dmean, and D98%. Organs at risk (OARs) D2% agreed within 0.36%. A dedicated VUE LUT lead to smaller dose differences, achieving a 100% gamma pass rate for all subjects. VUE imaging showed similar translations and rotations to CECT, with significant but minor translation differences (<0.02 cm). VUE-based registration outperformed CECT. In 24% of CBCT-CECT registrations, inadequate registration was observed due to contrast-related issues, while corresponding VUE images achieved clinically acceptable registrations. Conclusions: VUE imaging in the radiotherapy workflow is feasible, showing comparable dose distributions and improved CBCT registration results compared to CECT. VUE enables automated bone registration, limiting inter-observer variation in the Image-Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) process.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100545
Pages (from-to)100545
JournalPhysics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Volume29
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2024

Keywords

  • Contrast-enhanced CT
  • Dual-energy CT
  • Gynecological irradiation
  • Photon therapy
  • Virtual non-contrast
  • Virtual unenhanced

Cite this