TY - JOUR
T1 - WARRIOR-trial - is routine radiography following the 2-week initial follow-up in trauma patients with wrist and ankle fractures necessary
T2 - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
AU - Weil, N.L.
AU - Termaat, M.F.
AU - Rubinstein, S.M.
AU - El Moumni, M.
AU - Zuidema, W.P.
AU - Derksen, R.J.
AU - Krijnen, P.
AU - van Bodegom-Vos, L.
AU - Wendt, K.W.
AU - van Kuijk, C.
AU - Rosendaal, F.R.
AU - Breederveld, R.S.
AU - Goslings, J.C.
AU - Schipper, I.B.
AU - van Tulder, M.W.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - BACKGROUND: Extremity fractures such as wrist and ankle fractures are a common and costly healthcare problem. The management of these fractures depends on fracture type and loss of congruity of the joint, resulting in cast immobilization or operative treatment. Loss of congruity or displacement leading to uneven joint loading, osteoarthritis and an increased probability of a poor functional outcome should be identified within the first 2 weeks post-trauma, based upon radiographs to determine optimal treatment. After this period, routine radiographs are scheduled for monitoring the bone-healing process. Current protocols describe imaging at 1, 2, 6 and 12 weeks post-trauma. However, it is questionable whether routine radiography following the initial follow-up ( 2-weeks post-trauma) is cost effective. The aim of this study is to determine whether a modification of the radiographic follow-up protocol can be conducted with no worse outcome and less cost than the current standard of care for patients with a wrist or ankle fracture.METHODS/DESIGN: In a multicenter randomized controlled trial, 697 patients aged 18 years or older will be included: 385 wrist fracture- and 312 ankle fracture patients. Patients will be randomized into two groups: Group 1 receives usual care, consisting of radiographs 1, 2, 6 and 12 weeks post-trauma; Group 2 receives radiographs beyond the initial follow-up only when clinically indicated. The primary outcome is the overall extremity-specific function. For wrist fractures, this includes the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score; for the ankle fractures, this includes the Olerud and Molander ankle score. Secondary outcomes include: healthcare cost, the specific function measured with the Patient Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation for wrist fractures and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons foot and ankle questionnaire for ankle fractures, pain-intensity, health-related quality of life, self-perceived recovery, and complications. Both groups will be monitored at 1, 2, and 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months.DISCUSSION: This study will provide data on (cost) effectiveness of routine radiography in the follow-up of wrist and ankle fractures, and could pave the way for a change in (inter)national protocols.TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register NTR4610 , registration date 22 June 2014.
AB - BACKGROUND: Extremity fractures such as wrist and ankle fractures are a common and costly healthcare problem. The management of these fractures depends on fracture type and loss of congruity of the joint, resulting in cast immobilization or operative treatment. Loss of congruity or displacement leading to uneven joint loading, osteoarthritis and an increased probability of a poor functional outcome should be identified within the first 2 weeks post-trauma, based upon radiographs to determine optimal treatment. After this period, routine radiographs are scheduled for monitoring the bone-healing process. Current protocols describe imaging at 1, 2, 6 and 12 weeks post-trauma. However, it is questionable whether routine radiography following the initial follow-up ( 2-weeks post-trauma) is cost effective. The aim of this study is to determine whether a modification of the radiographic follow-up protocol can be conducted with no worse outcome and less cost than the current standard of care for patients with a wrist or ankle fracture.METHODS/DESIGN: In a multicenter randomized controlled trial, 697 patients aged 18 years or older will be included: 385 wrist fracture- and 312 ankle fracture patients. Patients will be randomized into two groups: Group 1 receives usual care, consisting of radiographs 1, 2, 6 and 12 weeks post-trauma; Group 2 receives radiographs beyond the initial follow-up only when clinically indicated. The primary outcome is the overall extremity-specific function. For wrist fractures, this includes the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score; for the ankle fractures, this includes the Olerud and Molander ankle score. Secondary outcomes include: healthcare cost, the specific function measured with the Patient Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation for wrist fractures and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons foot and ankle questionnaire for ankle fractures, pain-intensity, health-related quality of life, self-perceived recovery, and complications. Both groups will be monitored at 1, 2, and 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months.DISCUSSION: This study will provide data on (cost) effectiveness of routine radiography in the follow-up of wrist and ankle fractures, and could pave the way for a change in (inter)national protocols.TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register NTR4610 , registration date 22 June 2014.
KW - Ankle Fractures/diagnostic imaging
KW - Arthrography/economics
KW - Clinical Protocols
KW - Cost-Benefit Analysis
KW - Disability Evaluation
KW - Fracture Healing
KW - Health Care Costs
KW - Humans
KW - Netherlands
KW - Pain Measurement
KW - Predictive Value of Tests
KW - Quality of Life
KW - Recovery of Function
KW - Research Design
KW - Surveys and Questionnaires
KW - Time Factors
KW - Treatment Outcome
KW - Wrist Injuries/diagnostic imaging
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0600-x
DO - https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0600-x
M3 - Article
C2 - 25872504
SN - 1745-6215
VL - 16
SP - 66
JO - Trials
JF - Trials
IS - 1
M1 - 66
ER -