Dosimetric comparison of five different techniques for craniospinal irradiation across 15 European centers: analysis on behalf of the SIOP-E-BTG (radiotherapy working group)

  • Enrica Seravalli (Creator)
  • Mirjam Bosman (Creator)
  • Yasmin Lassen-Ramshad (Creator)
  • Anne Vestergaard (Creator)
  • Foppe Oldenburger (Creator)
  • Jorrit Visser (Creator)
  • Efi Koutsouveli (Creator)
  • Chryssa Paraskevopoulou (Creator)
  • Gail Horan (Creator)
  • Thankamma Ajithkumar (Creator)
  • Beate Timmermann (Creator)
  • Carolina-Sofia Fuentes (Creator)
  • Gillian Whitfield (Creator)
  • Thomas Marchant (Creator)
  • Laetitia Padovani (Creator)
  • Eloise Garnier (Creator)
  • Lorenza Gandola (Creator)
  • Silvia Meroni (Creator)
  • Bianca A. W. Hoeben (Creator)
  • Martijn Kusters (Creator)
  • Claire Alapetite (Creator)
  • Sandra Losa (Creator)
  • Farid Goudjil (Creator)
  • Henriette Magelssen (Creator)
  • Morten Egeberg Evensen (Creator)
  • Frank Saran (Creator)
  • Gregory Smyth (Creator)
  • Barbara Rombi (Creator)
  • Roberto Righetto (Creator)
  • Rolf-Dieter Kortmann (Creator)
  • Geert O. Janssens (Creator)

Dataset

Description

Conventional techniques (3D-CRT) for craniospinal irradiation (CSI) are still widely used. Modern techniques (IMRT, VMAT, TomoTherapy®, proton pencil beam scanning [PBS]) are applied in a limited number of centers. For a 14-year-old patient, we aimed to...
Date made available2022
PublisherTaylor & Francis

Access Dataset

Cite this