TY - JOUR
T1 - A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial of Lactobacillus acidophilus for the Treatment of Acute Watery Diarrhea in Vietnamese Children
AU - on behalf of the Oxford-Vietnam Probiotics Study Group
AU - Chau, Tran Thi Hong
AU - Chau, Nguyen Ngoc Minh
AU - le, Nhat Thanh Hoang
AU - The, Hao Chung
AU - Vinh, Phat Voong
AU - To, Nguyen Thi Nguyen
AU - Ngoc, Nguyen Minh
AU - Tuan, Ha Manh
AU - Chau Ngoc, Tang Le
AU - Kolader, Marion-Eliette
AU - Farrar, Jeremy J.
AU - Wolbers, Marcel
AU - Thwaites, Guy E.
AU - Baker, Stephen
AU - Campbell, James I.
AU - Merson, Laura
AU - Thompson, Corinne N.
AU - Tuyen, Ha Thanh
AU - Thi, Van Vo
AU - van Khanh, Nguyen Hong
AU - Loan, Nguyen Thi Hong
AU - Thu, Nguyen Thi Thu
AU - Khoa, Vo Hoang
AU - Tu, Nguyen Cam
AU - Tam, Nguyen Thi Thanh
AU - Vinh, Ha
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Background: Probiotics are the most frequently prescribed treatment for children hospitalized with diarrhea in Vietnam. We were uncertain of the benefits of probiotics for the treatment of acute watery diarrhea in Vietnamese children. Methods: We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of children hospitalized with acute watery diarrhea in Vietnam. Children meeting the inclusion criteria (acute watery diarrhea) were randomized to receive either 2 daily oral doses of 2 × 108 CFUs of a local probiotic containing Lactobacillus acidophilus or placebo for 5 days as an adjunct to standard of care. The primary end point was time from the first dose of study medication to the start of the first 24-hour period without diarrhea. Secondary outcomes included the total duration of diarrhea and hospitalization, daily stool frequency, treatment failure, daily fecal concentrations of rotavirus and norovirus, and Lactobacillus colonization. Results: One hundred and fifty children were randomized into each study group. The median time from the first dose of study medication to the start of the first 24-hour diarrhea-free period was 43 hours (interquartile range, 15-66 hours) in the placebo group and 35 hours (interquartile range, 20-68 hours) in the probiotic group (acceleration factor 1.09 [95% confidence interval, 0.78-1.51]; P = 0.62). There was also no evidence that probiotic treatment was efficacious in any of the predefined subgroups nor significantly associated with any secondary end point. Conclusions: This was a large double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in which the probiotic underwent longitudinal quality control. We found under these conditions that L. acidophilus was not beneficial in treating children with acute watery diarrhea.
AB - Background: Probiotics are the most frequently prescribed treatment for children hospitalized with diarrhea in Vietnam. We were uncertain of the benefits of probiotics for the treatment of acute watery diarrhea in Vietnamese children. Methods: We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of children hospitalized with acute watery diarrhea in Vietnam. Children meeting the inclusion criteria (acute watery diarrhea) were randomized to receive either 2 daily oral doses of 2 × 108 CFUs of a local probiotic containing Lactobacillus acidophilus or placebo for 5 days as an adjunct to standard of care. The primary end point was time from the first dose of study medication to the start of the first 24-hour period without diarrhea. Secondary outcomes included the total duration of diarrhea and hospitalization, daily stool frequency, treatment failure, daily fecal concentrations of rotavirus and norovirus, and Lactobacillus colonization. Results: One hundred and fifty children were randomized into each study group. The median time from the first dose of study medication to the start of the first 24-hour diarrhea-free period was 43 hours (interquartile range, 15-66 hours) in the placebo group and 35 hours (interquartile range, 20-68 hours) in the probiotic group (acceleration factor 1.09 [95% confidence interval, 0.78-1.51]; P = 0.62). There was also no evidence that probiotic treatment was efficacious in any of the predefined subgroups nor significantly associated with any secondary end point. Conclusions: This was a large double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in which the probiotic underwent longitudinal quality control. We found under these conditions that L. acidophilus was not beneficial in treating children with acute watery diarrhea.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85038907406&origin=inward
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28787388
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000001712
DO - https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000001712
M3 - Article
C2 - 28787388
SN - 0891-3668
VL - 37
SP - 35
EP - 42
JO - Pediatric infectious disease journal
JF - Pediatric infectious disease journal
IS - 1
ER -