A registry study on radial head arthroplasties in the Netherlands: Indications, types and short-term survival

Arno A. Macken, Ante Prkić, Koen L. M. Koenraadt, Iris van Oost, Anneke Spekenbrink-Spooren, Bertram The, Denise Eygendaal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: This study aims to use the Dutch Arthroplasty Register data to report an overview of the contemporary indications and implant designs, and report the short-term survival of radial head arthroplasty. Methods: From the Dutch Arthroplasty Register, data on patient demographics, surgery and revision were extracted for radial head arthroplasties performed from January 2014 to December 2019. Implant survival was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: Two hundred fifty-eight arthroplasties were included with a median follow-up of 2.2 years. The most common indication was a fracture of the radial head (178, 69%). One hundred thirty-nine (68%) of the prostheses were of bipolar design, and the most commonly used implant type was the Radial Head System (Tornier; 134, 51%). Of the 258 included radial head arthroplasties, 16 were revised at a median of six months after surgery. Reason for revision was predominantly aseptic loosening (9). The overall implant survival was 95.8% after one year, 90.5% after three years and 89.5% after five years. Discussion: For radial head arthroplasties, acute trauma is the most common indication and Radial Head System the most commonly used implant. The implant survival is 89.5% after five years.
Original languageEnglish
JournalShoulder and elbow
Early online date2021
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2021

Keywords

  • Radial head
  • arthroplasty
  • implant design
  • indication
  • outcome
  • registry
  • survival

Cite this