A successful transcatheter aortic valve implantation in an extremely tortuous s-shaped aorta due to chest deformation

Aleksandra Gąsecka, Katarzyna Solarska, Bartłomiej Rydz, Iga Ślesicka, Bartosz Rymuza, Zenon Huczek, Janusz Kochman

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorAcademic

    Abstract

    A 65-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital for interventional treatment of aortic stenosis. Echocardiography confirmed severe aortic stenosis and a normal left ventricular ejection fraction (60%). Computed tomography demonstrated an extremely tortuous, S-shaped descending aorta and a significant scoliosis with chest wall deformation (Figs. 1A, B). Considering the complex anatomy, the Heart Team qualified the patient for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), despite the low peri-operative risk (1.54% in the EuroScore II). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation was performed in a standard manner, under local anesthesia, from the right femoral artery. Once the Confida Brecker Curve guidewire was placed in the aortic arch, the valve was predilated with 20 mm balloon. A 26 mm Evolut PRO valve (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota) was slowly advanced into the aorta, which was techni cally challenging (Fig. 1C, Suppl. Video 1). The valve was correctly aligned and deployed under rapid pacing (120/min). Aortogram at the end of the procedure showed no evidence of aortic injury or paravalvular leak (Fig. 1D). Procedural success was confirmed by control transthoracic echocardiography. The indications for transfemoral TAVI are expanding. The final decision considering the type of procedure should be made by the Heart Team, based on an individual’s evaluation. Despite the low risk of mortality following surgery, the patient suffered from the extreme chest wall deformation which made successful sternotomy and latter rehabilitation improbable. Given the flexibility of second generation TAVI delivery systems, it is possible to safely perform the procedure even in a severely tortuous anatomy, which was initially considered a contraindication for TAVI.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)790-791
    Number of pages2
    JournalCardiology journal
    Volume28
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 3 Sept 2021

    Cite this