Adherence to guideline recommendations in the management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: an analysis of the CROES–UTUC registry

Joyce Baard, Shahrokh F. Shariat, Morgan Roupret, Takashi Yoshida, Alberto Saita, Iliya Saltirov, Javier Revilla Burgos, Orcun Celik, Jean de la Rosette, Pilar Laguna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The European Association of Urology provides Clinical Practice Guideline on upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Due to the rarity of UTUC, guidelines are necessary to help guide decision-making based on the highest quality of care evidence available. Objectives: To evaluate guideline adherence in the management of UTUC by assessing recommendations on diagnostics needed for risk classification and subsequent treatment selection; to assess predictors for the latter. Participants: Data from the Clinical Research Office of the Endo Urology Society UTUC-registry were included for analysis. Statistical analysis: Overall compliance were evaluated by cross-tables, differences in risk groups characteristics and treatment selection were assessed by Chi-square tests, predictors for treatment selection by logistic regression analysis. Results: Data from 2380 patients were included. Imaging by CT-scan had highest adherence (85%) but was low for other diagnostics (17.7–49.7%). Multivariable regression analysis showed higher odds of receiving radical nephroureterectomy in patients with large tumours (OR 5.45, 95% CI 3.77–7.87, p < 0.001), signs of invasion (OR 3.07,CI 2.11–4.46, p < 0.001), high tumour grade (OR 2.05, CI 1.38–3.05, p < 0.001) and multifocality (OR 1.76,CI 1.05–2.97, p =0.032). Conclusions: CT-imaging is the most used and most impactful decision tool for risk-stratification and treatment selection in UTUC. Due to the low compliance in most of the diagnostic recommendations, proper risk stratification is not possible in a significant group of patients raising the question whether current stratification is deemed applicable in daily practice. Established prognostic factors on survival guides decision-making regarding radical versus kidney-sparing surgery. Tumour size was the most influencing factor on treatment decision. Clinical trial registration: The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02281188; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02281188).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2755-2763
Number of pages9
JournalWorld Journal of Urology
Volume40
Issue number11
Early online date2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2022

Keywords

  • Clinical practice guidelines
  • Guidelines
  • UTUC
  • Upper tract urothelial carcinoma
  • Urothelial carcinoma

Cite this