TY - JOUR
T1 - An international, interprofessional investigation of the self-reported podcast listening habits of emergency clinicians: A METRIQ Study
AU - Thoma, Brent
AU - Goerzen, Scott
AU - Horeczko, Timothy
AU - Roland, Damian
AU - Tagg, Andrew
AU - Chan, Teresa M.
AU - Bruijns, Stevan
AU - Riddell, Jeff
AU - The Metriq Podcast Study Collaborators
AU - Aldawood, Mohammed M.
AU - Aldawood, Mohammed Makki
AU - Alex, Mathew
AU - Ali, Salma
AU - Allan, Laura
AU - Almuhanna, Mohammed
AU - Amaratunga, Ashwini
AU - Amayo, Jeremy
AU - Anderson, Natalie
AU - Anjum, Omar
AU - Astvad, Mads
AU - Azim, Arden
AU - Bafuma, Patrick
AU - Bailey, Michelle
AU - Baker, Steve
AU - Baldino, Kimberly
AU - Banaszek, Joanna
AU - Barber, Alex
AU - Barton, David
AU - Batt, Alan
AU - Baumgartner, Rachel
AU - Baylis, Jared
AU - Bechamp, Taylor
AU - Beckett, Stéphanie
AU - Bell, Chris
AU - Benini, Antônio Felippe
AU - Beyene, Temesgen
AU - Bhatia, Meghan
AU - Biedermann, Richard
AU - Bjö Rling, M. rta
AU - Blackbourn, Jessica
AU - Blanchard, Michael
AU - Blanco, Iria Miguens
AU - Blondeau, Brandon
AU - Boling, Bryan
AU - Bowman, Andrew
AU - Bradshaw, Emma
AU - Brazil, Victoria
AU - Breden, Ian
AU - Bridges, Page
AU - Knijnenberg, Lisa
AU - Ridderikhof, Milan
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Objectives Podcasts are increasingly being used for medical education. A deeper understanding of usage patterns would inform both producers and researchers of medical podcasts. We aimed to determine how and why podcasts are used by emergency medicine and critical care clinicians.Methods An international interprofessional sample (medical students, residents, physicians, nurses, physician assistants, and paramedics) was recruited through direct contact and a multimodal social media (Twitter and Facebook) campaign. Each participant completed a survey outlining how and why they utilize medical podcasts. Recruitment materials included an infographic and study website.Results 390 participants from 33 countries and 4 professions (medicine, nursing, paramedicine, physician assistant) completed the survey. Participants most frequently listened to medical podcasts to review new literature (75.8%), learn core material (75.1%), and refresh memory (71.8%). The majority (62.6%) were aware of the ability to listen at increased speeds, but most (76.9%) listened at 1.0 x (normal) speed. All but 25 (6.4%) participants concurrently performed other tasks while listening. Driving (72.3%), exercising (39.7%), and completing chores (39.2%) were the most common. A minority of participants used active learning techniques such as pausing, rewinding, and replaying segments of the podcast. Very few listened to podcasts multiple times.Conclusions An international cohort of emergency clinicians use medical podcasts predominantly for learning. Their listening habits (rarely employing active learning strategies and frequently performing concurrent tasks) may not support this goal. Further exploration of the impact of these activities on learning from podcasts is warranted.
AB - Objectives Podcasts are increasingly being used for medical education. A deeper understanding of usage patterns would inform both producers and researchers of medical podcasts. We aimed to determine how and why podcasts are used by emergency medicine and critical care clinicians.Methods An international interprofessional sample (medical students, residents, physicians, nurses, physician assistants, and paramedics) was recruited through direct contact and a multimodal social media (Twitter and Facebook) campaign. Each participant completed a survey outlining how and why they utilize medical podcasts. Recruitment materials included an infographic and study website.Results 390 participants from 33 countries and 4 professions (medicine, nursing, paramedicine, physician assistant) completed the survey. Participants most frequently listened to medical podcasts to review new literature (75.8%), learn core material (75.1%), and refresh memory (71.8%). The majority (62.6%) were aware of the ability to listen at increased speeds, but most (76.9%) listened at 1.0 x (normal) speed. All but 25 (6.4%) participants concurrently performed other tasks while listening. Driving (72.3%), exercising (39.7%), and completing chores (39.2%) were the most common. A minority of participants used active learning techniques such as pausing, rewinding, and replaying segments of the podcast. Very few listened to podcasts multiple times.Conclusions An international cohort of emergency clinicians use medical podcasts predominantly for learning. Their listening habits (rarely employing active learning strategies and frequently performing concurrent tasks) may not support this goal. Further exploration of the impact of these activities on learning from podcasts is warranted.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85078469666&origin=inward
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31760965
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1017/cem.2019.427
DO - https://doi.org/10.1017/cem.2019.427
M3 - Article
C2 - 31760965
SN - 1481-8035
VL - 22
SP - 112
EP - 117
JO - CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
JF - CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
IS - 1
ER -