TY - JOUR
T1 - Applying GRADE for diagnosis revealed methodological challenges: an illustrative example for guideline developers
AU - Tuut, Mariska
AU - de Beer, Hans
AU - Burgers, Jako
AU - van de Griendt, Erik-Jonas
AU - van der Weijden, Trudy
AU - Langendam, Miranda
N1 - Funding Information: The authors thank Martijn Sijbom PhD, Leiden University Medical Center, for his cooperation in the determination of patient-important outcome measures, and Rikie Deurenberg, SIROSS, for the literature searches. Publisher Copyright: © 2020 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2021/3/1
Y1 - 2021/3/1
N2 - Objective: To identify challenges in the application of GRADE for diagnosis when assessing the certainty of evidence in the test-treatment strategy (diagnostic accuracy, test burden, management effectiveness, natural course, linked evidence) in an illustrative example and to propose solutions to these challenges. Study Design and Setting: A case study in applying GRADE for diagnosis that looked at the added value of IgE for diagnosing allergic rhinitis. Results: Evaluation of the full test-treatment strategy showed a lack of (high-quality) evidence for all elements. In our example, we found a lack of evidence for test burden, natural course, and link between the test result and clinical management. Overall, systematically reviewing the evidence for all elements of a test-treatment strategy is more time-consuming than only considering test accuracy results and management effectiveness. For increasing efficiency, the guideline panel could determine critical elements of the test-treatment strategy that need a systematic review of the evidence. For less critical elements, a guideline panel can rely on gray literature and professional expertise. Conclusion: A lack of high-quality evidence and time investment if the full test-treatment strategy is assessed, creating challenges in applying GRADE for diagnosis. Discussion within guideline panels about critical elements that need to be reviewed might help.
AB - Objective: To identify challenges in the application of GRADE for diagnosis when assessing the certainty of evidence in the test-treatment strategy (diagnostic accuracy, test burden, management effectiveness, natural course, linked evidence) in an illustrative example and to propose solutions to these challenges. Study Design and Setting: A case study in applying GRADE for diagnosis that looked at the added value of IgE for diagnosing allergic rhinitis. Results: Evaluation of the full test-treatment strategy showed a lack of (high-quality) evidence for all elements. In our example, we found a lack of evidence for test burden, natural course, and link between the test result and clinical management. Overall, systematically reviewing the evidence for all elements of a test-treatment strategy is more time-consuming than only considering test accuracy results and management effectiveness. For increasing efficiency, the guideline panel could determine critical elements of the test-treatment strategy that need a systematic review of the evidence. For less critical elements, a guideline panel can rely on gray literature and professional expertise. Conclusion: A lack of high-quality evidence and time investment if the full test-treatment strategy is assessed, creating challenges in applying GRADE for diagnosis. Discussion within guideline panels about critical elements that need to be reviewed might help.
KW - Diagnosis
KW - Evidence
KW - GRADE
KW - Guidelines
KW - Medical tests
KW - Systematic review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098103529&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.11.021
DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.11.021
M3 - Article
C2 - 33278615
SN - 0895-4356
VL - 131
SP - 123
EP - 132
JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
ER -