Assessment of LV ejection fraction using real-time 3D echocardiography in daily practice: Direct comparison of the volumetric and speckle tracking methodologies to CMR

M. M. P. Driessen; E. Kort; M. J. M. Cramer; P. A. Doevendans; M. J. Angevaare; T. Leiner; F. J. Meijboom; S. A. J. Chamuleau; G. T. Sieswerda

doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-014-0577-1

Assessment of LV ejection fraction using real-time 3D echocardiography in daily practice: Direct comparison of the volumetric and speckle tracking methodologies to CMR

M. M. P. Driessen, E. Kort, M. J. M. Cramer, P. A. Doevendans, M. J. Angevaare, T. Leiner, F. J. Meijboom, S. A. J. Chamuleau, G. T. Sieswerda

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Results Thirty-five patients were included (49.7±15.7 years; 55 % male), 30 (85.7 %) volumetric and 27 (77.1 %) speckle tracking datasets could be analysed. CMR derived LVEDV, LVESV and LVEF were 198±58 ml, 106±53 ml and 49± 15 %, respectively. LVEF derived from speckle tracking was accurate and reproducible in all observers (all intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC)>0.86). LVEF derived from the volumetric method correlated well to CMR in experienced observers (ICC 0.85 and 0.86) but only moderately in less experienced observers (ICC 0.58 and 0.77) and was less reproducible in these observers (ICC=0.55). Volumes were significantly underestimated compared with CMR (p<0.001).

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	383-390
Journal	Netherlands heart journal
Volume	22
Issue number	9
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-014-0577-1
Publication status	Published - 1 Sept 2014
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-014-0577-1

Cite this

Driessen, M. M. P., Kort, E., Cramer, M. J. M., Doevendans, P. A., Angevaare, M. J., Leiner, T., Meijboom, F. J., Chamuleau, S. A. J., & Sieswerda, G. T. (2014). Assessment of LV ejection fraction using real-time 3D echocardiography in daily practice: Direct comparison of the volumetric and speckle tracking methodologies to CMR. Netherlands heart journal, 22(9), 383-390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-014-0577-1

@article{3ae8ec339f094714a3451c03c07f50e3,

title = "Assessment of LV ejection fraction using real-time 3D echocardiography in daily practice: Direct comparison of the volumetric and speckle tracking methodologies to CMR",

abstract = "Results Thirty-five patients were included (49.7±15.7 years; 55 % male), 30 (85.7 %) volumetric and 27 (77.1 %) speckle tracking datasets could be analysed. CMR derived LVEDV, LVESV and LVEF were 198±58 ml, 106±53 ml and 49± 15 %, respectively. LVEF derived from speckle tracking was accurate and reproducible in all observers (all intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC)>0.86). LVEF derived from the volumetric method correlated well to CMR in experienced observers (ICC 0.85 and 0.86) but only moderately in less experienced observers (ICC 0.58 and 0.77) and was less reproducible in these observers (ICC=0.55). Volumes were significantly underestimated compared with CMR (p<0.001).",

author = "Driessen, {M. M. P.} and E. Kort and Cramer, {M. J. M.} and Doevendans, {P. A.} and Angevaare, {M. J.} and T. Leiner and Meijboom, {F. J.} and Chamuleau, {S. A. J.} and Sieswerda, {G. T.}",

year = "2014",

month = sep,

day = "1",

doi = "https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-014-0577-1",

language = "English",

volume = "22",

pages = "383--390",

journal = "Netherlands heart journal",

issn = "1568-5888",

publisher = "Bohn Stafleu van Loghum",

number = "9",

}

Driessen, MMP, Kort, E, Cramer, MJM, Doevendans, PA, Angevaare, MJ, Leiner, T, Meijboom, FJ, Chamuleau, SAJ & Sieswerda, GT 2014, 'Assessment of LV ejection fraction using real-time 3D echocardiography in daily practice: Direct comparison of the volumetric and speckle tracking methodologies to CMR', Netherlands heart journal, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 383-390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-014-0577-1

Assessment of LV ejection fraction using real-time 3D echocardiography in daily practice: Direct comparison of the volumetric and speckle tracking methodologies to CMR. / Driessen, M. M. P.; Kort, E.; Cramer, M. J. M. et al.
In: Netherlands heart journal, Vol. 22, No. 9, 01.09.2014, p. 383-390.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of LV ejection fraction using real-time 3D echocardiography in daily practice: Direct comparison of the volumetric and speckle tracking methodologies to CMR

AU - Driessen, M. M. P.

AU - Kort, E.

AU - Cramer, M. J. M.

AU - Doevendans, P. A.

AU - Angevaare, M. J.

AU - Leiner, T.

AU - Meijboom, F. J.

AU - Chamuleau, S. A. J.

AU - Sieswerda, G. T.

PY - 2014/9/1

Y1 - 2014/9/1

N2 - Results Thirty-five patients were included (49.7±15.7 years; 55 % male), 30 (85.7 %) volumetric and 27 (77.1 %) speckle tracking datasets could be analysed. CMR derived LVEDV, LVESV and LVEF were 198±58 ml, 106±53 ml and 49± 15 %, respectively. LVEF derived from speckle tracking was accurate and reproducible in all observers (all intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC)>0.86). LVEF derived from the volumetric method correlated well to CMR in experienced observers (ICC 0.85 and 0.86) but only moderately in less experienced observers (ICC 0.58 and 0.77) and was less reproducible in these observers (ICC=0.55). Volumes were significantly underestimated compared with CMR (p<0.001).

AB - Results Thirty-five patients were included (49.7±15.7 years; 55 % male), 30 (85.7 %) volumetric and 27 (77.1 %) speckle tracking datasets could be analysed. CMR derived LVEDV, LVESV and LVEF were 198±58 ml, 106±53 ml and 49± 15 %, respectively. LVEF derived from speckle tracking was accurate and reproducible in all observers (all intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC)>0.86). LVEF derived from the volumetric method correlated well to CMR in experienced observers (ICC 0.85 and 0.86) but only moderately in less experienced observers (ICC 0.58 and 0.77) and was less reproducible in these observers (ICC=0.55). Volumes were significantly underestimated compared with CMR (p<0.001).

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84907145340&origin=inward

UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25143268

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-014-0577-1

DO - https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-014-0577-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 25143268

SN - 1568-5888

VL - 22

SP - 383

EP - 390

JO - Netherlands heart journal

JF - Netherlands heart journal

IS - 9

ER -

Assessment of LV ejection fraction using real-time 3D echocardiography in daily practice: Direct comparison of the volumetric and speckle tracking methodologies to CMR

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this