Associations between Disordered Eating Behaviors and HbA1c in Young People with Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Kevin P. Marks, Jori Aalders, Shengxin Liu, Melanie Broadley, Mikael Thastum, Morten B. Jensen, Else H. Ibfelt, Niels H. Birkebaek, Frans Pouwer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: In type 1 diabetes, disordered eating behaviors (DEB) can adversely impact HbA 1c. Diabetes-adapted DEB questionnaires assess intentional insulin omission, whereas generic questionnaires do not. Given the number of studies describing DEB-HbA 1c associations pub-lished over the past decade, an updated systematic review is warranted. Objective: The study aimed to examine the associations between DEBs assessed by generic and di-abetes-adapted questionnaires (and subscales) and HbA 1c among young people (<29 years) with type 1 diabetes. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, PsycInfo, and CINAHL data-bases. Observational studies examining associations between DEB as assessed by questionnaires and HbA 1c were included. Publication information, DEB and HbA 1c characteristics, and DEB-HbA 1c associations were extracted. Hedges’ g was calculated for mean HbA 1c differences between groups with and without DEB. Results: The systematic search yielded 733 reports, of which 39 reports representing 35 unique studies met the inclusion criteria. Nineteen studies assessing DEB by diabetes-adapted questionnaires (n=5,795) and seven using generic questionnaires (n=2,162) provided data for meta-analysis. For diabetes-adapted questionnaires, DEB was associated with higher HbA 1c (g=0.62 CI=0.52; 0.73) with a similar effect size when restricted to validated questionnaires (g=0.61; CI=0.50; 0.73). DEB was not associated with HbA 1c for generic questionnaires (g=0.19; CI=-0.17; 0.55), but significantly associated with higher HbA 1c for validated generic questionnaires (g=0.32; 95% CI=0.16-0.48). Participant and HbA 1c collection characteristics were often inadequately described. Conclusion: Diabetes-adapted DEB questionnaires should be used in youth with type 1 diabetes because they capture intentional insulin omission and are more strongly associated with HbA 1c than generic DEB questionnaires.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere220823220144
JournalCurrent diabetes reviews
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Keywords

  • Type 1 diabetes
  • adolescent diabe-tes
  • eating behaviors
  • glycemic control
  • hemoglobin A1c (HbA )
  • pediatric diabetes

Cite this