Asymptomatic vaginal Candida colonization and adverse pregnancy outcomes including preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Heleen J. Schuster, Bastienne A. de Jonghe, Jacqueline Limpens, Andries E. Budding, Rebecca C. Painter

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: During pregnancy, vaginal colonization by Candida spp is common. Some studies suggest an association between asymptomatic vaginal Candida colonization and adverse pregnancy outcomes, but the evidence is inconsistent. This review aimed to systematically review the association between asymptomatic vaginal colonization by Candida spp and adverse pregnancy outcomes, including preterm birth. Data Sources: We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to May 6, 2020 for published studies on vaginal Candida/yeast and pregnancy outcomes. Study Eligibility Criteria: Cohort studies, case-control studies, and randomized controlled trials that included pregnant women who were tested for asymptomatic vaginal Candida colonization and reported on adverse pregnancy outcomes were eligible. Study Appraisal and Synthesis Methods: Two reviewers independently selected and extracted the data. Critical appraisal was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for cohort and case-control studies and the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized controlled trials. Results: We found no significant difference in preterm birth rate between Candida-positive and Candida-negative women (odds ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.99–1.22; I2, 0%) in 15 studies among 33,321 women for either spontaneous preterm birth only (odds ratio, 1.13, 95% confidence interval, 0.97–1.31; I2, 0%) or all preterm birth (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.79–1.35; I2, 21%). Subgroup analyses for a treatment strategy including only studies reporting on spontaneous preterm birth did not reveal any statistically significant associations either, although the odds ratio was increased for the untreated Candida-positive women (odds ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.90–1.81; I2, 13%) in 3 studies among 5175 women. Asymptomatic vaginal Candida colonization was not associated with small for gestational age, perinatal mortality, or any other adverse pregnancy outcome. Conclusion: Asymptomatic vaginal Candida colonization is not associated with preterm birth and other adverse pregnancy outcomes. Previous studies reported that treatment of this microorganism reduces preterm birth rate. Our results suggest that this effect is unlikely to rely on treatment of vaginal Candida.
Original languageEnglish
Article number100163
Pages (from-to)100163
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology MFM
Volume2
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2020

Cite this