Attending doctors' perspectives on how residents learn

P. W. Teunissen, K. Boor, A. J. J. A. Scherpbier, C. P. M. van der Vleuten, J. A. A. M. van Diemen-Steenvoorde, S. J. van Luijk, F. Scheele

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

48 Citations (Scopus)


Context: Graduate medical education is currently facing major educational reforms. There is a lack of empirical evidence in the literature about the learning processes of residents in the clinical workplace. This qualitative study uses a 'grounded theory' approach to continue the development of a theoretical framework of learning in the clinical workplace by adding the perspective of attending doctors. Methods: A total of 21 Dutch attending doctors involved in the training of residents in obstetrics and gynaecology participated in 1 of 3 focus group sessions. They discussed their perceptions of how residents learn and what factors influence residents' learning. A grounded theory approach was used to analyse the transcribed discussions. Results: Three related themes emerged. The first concerned the central role of participation in work-related activities: according to attending doctors, residents learn by tackling the everyday challenges of clinical work. The second involved the ways in which attending doctors influence what residents learn from work-related activities. The final theme focused on attending doctors' views of the essential characteristics of residents and their development during residency. Conclusions: Attending doctors' perspectives complement current insights derived from similar research among residents and from related literature. As part of an ongoing effort to further develop understanding of how residents learn, this study adds several ways in which attending doctors strive to combine guidance in both patient care and resident training. Furthermore, attending doctors' perspectives draw attention to other aspects of learning in the clinical workplace, such as the role of confidence and the balance between supervision and independence. © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1050-1058
JournalMedical education
Issue number11
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Cite this