Away from definition and back to the clinic – As response to Kumar et al, ‘Evidence is not sufficient to declare the tubal gland conglomerates as salivary’

Sarah Pringle; Floris J. Bikker; Wouter Vogel; Bernadette S. de Bakker; Ingrid Hofland; Bert van der Vegt; Hendrika Bootsma; Frans G. M. Kroese; Arjan Vissink; Matthijs Valstar

doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109959

Away from definition and back to the clinic – As response to Kumar et al, ‘Evidence is not sufficient to declare the tubal gland conglomerates as salivary’

Sarah Pringle, Floris J. Bikker, Wouter Vogel, Bernadette S. de Bakker, Ingrid Hofland, Bert van der Vegt, Hendrika Bootsma, Frans G. M. Kroese, Arjan Vissink, Matthijs Valstar

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic

Original language	English
Article number	109959
Journal	Radiotherapy and oncology
Early online date	2023
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109959
Publication status	E-pub ahead of print - 2023

Access to Document

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109959

Cite this

Pringle, S., Bikker, F. J., Vogel, W., de Bakker, B. S., Hofland, I., van der Vegt, B., Bootsma, H., Kroese, F. G. M., Vissink, A., & Valstar, M. (2023). Away from definition and back to the clinic – As response to Kumar et al, ‘Evidence is not sufficient to declare the tubal gland conglomerates as salivary’. Radiotherapy and oncology, Article 109959. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109959

@article{3d24aa4a425b4e9f923d8456f2ddb675,

title = "Away from definition and back to the clinic – As response to Kumar et al, {\textquoteleft}Evidence is not sufficient to declare the tubal gland conglomerates as salivary{\textquoteright}",

author = "Sarah Pringle and Bikker, {Floris J.} and Wouter Vogel and {de Bakker}, {Bernadette S.} and Ingrid Hofland and {van der Vegt}, Bert and Hendrika Bootsma and Kroese, {Frans G. M.} and Arjan Vissink and Matthijs Valstar",

note = "Funding Information: This work was supported by funding from ReumaNederland (LongTerm Project LTP-29).",

year = "2023",

doi = "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109959",

language = "English",

journal = "Radiotherapy and oncology",

issn = "0167-8140",

publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Away from definition and back to the clinic – As response to Kumar et al, ‘Evidence is not sufficient to declare the tubal gland conglomerates as salivary’

AU - Pringle, Sarah

AU - Bikker, Floris J.

AU - Vogel, Wouter

AU - de Bakker, Bernadette S.

AU - Hofland, Ingrid

AU - van der Vegt, Bert

AU - Bootsma, Hendrika

AU - Kroese, Frans G. M.

AU - Vissink, Arjan

AU - Valstar, Matthijs

N1 - Funding Information: This work was supported by funding from ReumaNederland (LongTerm Project LTP-29).

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85177080903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109959

DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109959

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

SN - 0167-8140

JO - Radiotherapy and oncology

JF - Radiotherapy and oncology

M1 - 109959

ER -

Away from definition and back to the clinic – As response to Kumar et al, ‘Evidence is not sufficient to declare the tubal gland conglomerates as salivary’

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this