TY - JOUR
T1 - Barriers and facilitators to the conduct of critical care research in low and lower-middle income countries
T2 - A scoping review
AU - Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan, Bharath Kumar
AU - Gupta, Ena
AU - Ramakrishnan, Nagarajan
AU - Beane, Abi
AU - Haniffa, Rashan
AU - Lone, Nazir
AU - de Keizer, Nicolette
AU - Adhikari, Neill K. J.
N1 - Funding Information: Authors RH and AB were co-applicants on the grant. Wellcome Trust, U.K. (grant number WT215522/Z19/Z). https://wellcome.org/ The funder had no role in the design, conduct, analysis of this scoping review or in the decision to submit for publication We would like to acknowledge the assistance of Mr. Henry Lam and Miss. Taylor Moore, Senior Librarians at Sunnybrook Health Sciences, Toronto, Canada for their assistance with the development and implementation of the search strategy and Dr Lakshmi Ranganathan, Clinical Research Manager at Chennai Critical Care Consultants Pvt. Limited, Chennai, India for her assistance in manuscript formatting. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2022/5
Y1 - 2022/5
N2 - BACKGROUND: Improvements in health-related outcomes for critically ill adults in low and lower-middle income countries need systematic investments in research capacity and infrastructure. High-quality research has been shown to strengthen health systems; yet, research contributions from these regions remain negligible or absent. We undertook a scoping review to describe barriers and facilitators for the conduct of critical care research. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE up to December 2021 using a strategy that combined keyword and controlled vocabulary terms. We included original studies that reported on barriers or facilitators to the conduct of critical care research in these settings. Two reviewers independently reviewed titles and abstracts, and where necessary, the full-text to select eligible studies. For each study, reviewers independently extracted data using a standardized data extraction form. Barriers and facilitators were classified along the lines of a previous review and based on additional themes that emerged. Study quality was assessed using appropriate tools. RESULTS: We identified 2693 citations, evaluated 49 studies and identified 6 for inclusion. Of the included studies, four were qualitative, one was a cross-sectional survey and one was reported as an 'analysis'. The total number of participants ranged from 20-100 and included physicians, nurses, allied healthcare workers and researchers. Barriers identified included limited funding, poor institutional & national investment, inadequate access to mentors, absence of training in research methods, limited research support staff, and absence of statistical support. Our review identified potential solutions such as developing a mentorship network, streamlining of regulatory processes, implementing a centralized institutional research agenda, developing a core-outcome dataset and enhancing access to low-cost technology. CONCLUSION: Our scoping review highlights important barriers to the conduct of critical care research in low and lower-middle income countries, identifies potential solutions, and informs researchers, policymakers and governments on the steps necessary for strengthening research systems.
AB - BACKGROUND: Improvements in health-related outcomes for critically ill adults in low and lower-middle income countries need systematic investments in research capacity and infrastructure. High-quality research has been shown to strengthen health systems; yet, research contributions from these regions remain negligible or absent. We undertook a scoping review to describe barriers and facilitators for the conduct of critical care research. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE up to December 2021 using a strategy that combined keyword and controlled vocabulary terms. We included original studies that reported on barriers or facilitators to the conduct of critical care research in these settings. Two reviewers independently reviewed titles and abstracts, and where necessary, the full-text to select eligible studies. For each study, reviewers independently extracted data using a standardized data extraction form. Barriers and facilitators were classified along the lines of a previous review and based on additional themes that emerged. Study quality was assessed using appropriate tools. RESULTS: We identified 2693 citations, evaluated 49 studies and identified 6 for inclusion. Of the included studies, four were qualitative, one was a cross-sectional survey and one was reported as an 'analysis'. The total number of participants ranged from 20-100 and included physicians, nurses, allied healthcare workers and researchers. Barriers identified included limited funding, poor institutional & national investment, inadequate access to mentors, absence of training in research methods, limited research support staff, and absence of statistical support. Our review identified potential solutions such as developing a mentorship network, streamlining of regulatory processes, implementing a centralized institutional research agenda, developing a core-outcome dataset and enhancing access to low-cost technology. CONCLUSION: Our scoping review highlights important barriers to the conduct of critical care research in low and lower-middle income countries, identifies potential solutions, and informs researchers, policymakers and governments on the steps necessary for strengthening research systems.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129409294&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266836
DO - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266836
M3 - Review article
C2 - 35511911
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 17
SP - e0266836
JO - PLOS ONE
JF - PLOS ONE
IS - 5 May
M1 - e0266836
ER -