TY - JOUR
T1 - Behavioral sciences applied to acute care teams
T2 - a research agenda for the years ahead by a European research network
AU - Keller, Sandra
AU - Jelsma, Judith G. M.
AU - Tschan, Franziska
AU - Sevdalis, Nick
AU - Löllgen, Ruth M.
AU - Creutzfeldt, Johan
AU - Kennedy-Metz, Lauren R.
AU - Eppich, Walter
AU - Semmer, Norbert K.
AU - van Herzeele, Isabelle
AU - Härenstam, Karin Pukk
AU - de Bruijne, Martine C.
N1 - Funding Information: IvH is supported by a Senior Clinical Fellowship (802314N), Fund for Scientific Research – Flanders, Belgium. Publisher Copyright: © 2024, The Author(s).
PY - 2024/12/1
Y1 - 2024/12/1
N2 - Background: Multi-disciplinary behavioral research on acute care teams has focused on understanding how teams work and on identifying behaviors characteristic of efficient and effective team performance. We aimed to define important knowledge gaps and establish a research agenda for the years ahead of prioritized research questions in this field of applied health research. Methods: In the first step, high-priority research questions were generated by a small highly specialized group of 29 experts in the field, recruited from the multinational and multidisciplinary “Behavioral Sciences applied to Acute care teams and Surgery (BSAS)” research network – a cross-European, interdisciplinary network of researchers from social sciences as well as from the medical field committed to understanding the role of behavioral sciences in the context of acute care teams. A consolidated list of 59 research questions was established. In the second step, 19 experts attending the 2020 BSAS annual conference quantitatively rated the importance of each research question based on four criteria – usefulness, answerability, effectiveness, and translation into practice. In the third step, during half a day of the BSAS conference, the same group of 19 experts discussed the prioritization of the research questions in three online focus group meetings and established recommendations. Results: Research priorities identified were categorized into six topics: (1) interventions to improve team process; (2) dealing with and implementing new technologies; (3) understanding and measuring team processes; (4) organizational aspects impacting teamwork; (5) training and health professions education; and (6) organizational and patient safety culture in the healthcare domain. Experts rated the first three topics as particularly relevant in terms of research priorities; the focus groups identified specific research needs within each topic. Conclusions: Based on research priorities within the BSAS community and the broader field of applied health sciences identified through this work, we advocate for the prioritization for funding in these areas.
AB - Background: Multi-disciplinary behavioral research on acute care teams has focused on understanding how teams work and on identifying behaviors characteristic of efficient and effective team performance. We aimed to define important knowledge gaps and establish a research agenda for the years ahead of prioritized research questions in this field of applied health research. Methods: In the first step, high-priority research questions were generated by a small highly specialized group of 29 experts in the field, recruited from the multinational and multidisciplinary “Behavioral Sciences applied to Acute care teams and Surgery (BSAS)” research network – a cross-European, interdisciplinary network of researchers from social sciences as well as from the medical field committed to understanding the role of behavioral sciences in the context of acute care teams. A consolidated list of 59 research questions was established. In the second step, 19 experts attending the 2020 BSAS annual conference quantitatively rated the importance of each research question based on four criteria – usefulness, answerability, effectiveness, and translation into practice. In the third step, during half a day of the BSAS conference, the same group of 19 experts discussed the prioritization of the research questions in three online focus group meetings and established recommendations. Results: Research priorities identified were categorized into six topics: (1) interventions to improve team process; (2) dealing with and implementing new technologies; (3) understanding and measuring team processes; (4) organizational aspects impacting teamwork; (5) training and health professions education; and (6) organizational and patient safety culture in the healthcare domain. Experts rated the first three topics as particularly relevant in terms of research priorities; the focus groups identified specific research needs within each topic. Conclusions: Based on research priorities within the BSAS community and the broader field of applied health sciences identified through this work, we advocate for the prioritization for funding in these areas.
KW - Acute care
KW - Research agenda
KW - Surgery
KW - Teamwork
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85182245027&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-10555-6
DO - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-10555-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 38218788
SN - 1472-6963
VL - 24
JO - BMC Health Services Research
JF - BMC Health Services Research
IS - 1
M1 - 71
ER -