Biomedical doctoral students’ research practices when facing dilemmas: two vignette-based randomized control trials

V. T. Nguyen, M. K. Sharp, C. Superchi, G. Baron, K. Glonti, D. Blanco, M. Olsen, T. T. Vo Tat, C. Olarte Parra, A. Névéol, D. Hren, P. Ravaud, I. Boutron

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Our aim was to describe the research practices of doctoral students facing a dilemma to research integrity and to assess the impact of inappropriate research environments, i.e. exposure to (a) a post-doctoral researcher who committed a Detrimental Research Practice (DRP) in a similar situation and (b) a supervisor who did not oppose the DRP. We conducted two 2-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trials. We created 10 vignettes describing a realistic dilemma with two alternative courses of action (good practice versus DRP). 630 PhD students were randomized through an online system to a vignette (a) with (n = 151) or without (n = 164) exposure to a post-doctoral researcher; (b) with (n = 155) or without (n = 160) exposure to a supervisor. The primary outcome was a score from − 5 to + 5, where positive scores indicated the choice of DRP and negative scores indicated good practice. Overall, 37% of unexposed participants chose to commit DRP with important variation across vignettes (minimum 10%; maximum 66%). The mean difference [95%CI] was 0.17 [− 0.65 to 0.99;], p = 0.65 when exposed to the post-doctoral researcher, and 0.79 [− 0.38; 1.94], p = 0.16, when exposed to the supervisor. In conclusion, we did not find evidence of an impact of postdoctoral researchers and supervisors on student research practices. Trial registration: NCT04263805, NCT04263506 (registration date 11 February 2020).
Original languageEnglish
Article number16371
JournalScientific reports
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2023
Externally publishedYes

Cite this