TY - JOUR
T1 - Bone visualization of the cervical spine with deep learning-based synthetic CT compared to conventional CT
T2 - A single-center noninferiority study on image quality
AU - van der Kolk, Brigitta (Britt) Y. M.
AU - Slotman, Derk J. (Jorik)
AU - Nijholt, Ingrid M.
AU - van Osch, Jochen A. C.
AU - Snoeijink, Tess J.
AU - Podlogar, Martin
AU - van Hasselt, Boudewijn A. A. M.
AU - Boelhouwers, Henk J.
AU - van Stralen, Marijn
AU - Seevinck, Peter R.
AU - Schep, Niels W. L.
AU - Maas, Mario
AU - Boomsma, Martijn F.
N1 - Funding Information: This work was supported by MRIguidance BV, Utrecht, the Netherlands. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2022/9/1
Y1 - 2022/9/1
N2 - Purpose: To investigate whether the image quality of a specific deep learning-based synthetic CT (sCT) of the cervical spine is noninferior to conventional CT. Method: Paired MRI and CT data were collected from 25 consecutive participants (≥ 50 years) with cervical radiculopathy. The MRI exam included a T1-weighted multiple gradient echo sequence for sCT reconstruction. For qualitative image assessment, four structures at two vertebral levels were evaluated on sCT and compared with CT by three assessors using a four-point scale (range 1–4). The noninferiority margin was set at 0.5 point on this scale. Additionally, acceptable image quality was defined as a score of 3–4 in ≥ 80% of the scans. Quantitative assessment included geometrical analysis and voxelwise comparisons. Results: Qualitative image assessment showed that sCT was noninferior to CT for overall bone image quality, artifacts, imaging of intervertebral joints and neural foramina at levels C3-C4 and C6-C7, and cortical delineation at C6-C7. Noninferiority was weak to absent for cortical delineation at level C3-C4 and trabecular bone at both levels. Acceptable image quality was achieved for all structures in sCT and CT, except for trabecular bone in sCT and level C6-C7 in CT. Geometrical analysis of the sCT showed good to excellent agreement with CT. Voxelwise comparisons showed a mean absolute error of 80.05 (±6.12) HU, dice similarity coefficient (cortical bone) of 0.84 (±0.04) and structural similarity index of 0.86 (±0.02). Conclusions: This deep learning-based sCT was noninferior to conventional CT for the general visualization of bony structures of the cervical spine, artifacts, and most detailed structure assessments.
AB - Purpose: To investigate whether the image quality of a specific deep learning-based synthetic CT (sCT) of the cervical spine is noninferior to conventional CT. Method: Paired MRI and CT data were collected from 25 consecutive participants (≥ 50 years) with cervical radiculopathy. The MRI exam included a T1-weighted multiple gradient echo sequence for sCT reconstruction. For qualitative image assessment, four structures at two vertebral levels were evaluated on sCT and compared with CT by three assessors using a four-point scale (range 1–4). The noninferiority margin was set at 0.5 point on this scale. Additionally, acceptable image quality was defined as a score of 3–4 in ≥ 80% of the scans. Quantitative assessment included geometrical analysis and voxelwise comparisons. Results: Qualitative image assessment showed that sCT was noninferior to CT for overall bone image quality, artifacts, imaging of intervertebral joints and neural foramina at levels C3-C4 and C6-C7, and cortical delineation at C6-C7. Noninferiority was weak to absent for cortical delineation at level C3-C4 and trabecular bone at both levels. Acceptable image quality was achieved for all structures in sCT and CT, except for trabecular bone in sCT and level C6-C7 in CT. Geometrical analysis of the sCT showed good to excellent agreement with CT. Voxelwise comparisons showed a mean absolute error of 80.05 (±6.12) HU, dice similarity coefficient (cortical bone) of 0.84 (±0.04) and structural similarity index of 0.86 (±0.02). Conclusions: This deep learning-based sCT was noninferior to conventional CT for the general visualization of bony structures of the cervical spine, artifacts, and most detailed structure assessments.
KW - Artificial intelligence
KW - Cervical spine
KW - Deep learning
KW - Image quality
KW - Magnetic Resonance Imaging
KW - Synthetic CT
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85133247041&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110414
DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110414
M3 - Article
C2 - 35780607
SN - 0720-048X
VL - 154
JO - European Journal of Radiology
JF - European Journal of Radiology
M1 - 110414
ER -