TY - JOUR
T1 - Bone vitality and vascularization of mandibular and maxillary bone grafts in maxillary sinus floor elevation
T2 - A retrospective cohort study
AU - Wu, Vivian
AU - Schulten, Engelbert A. J. M.
AU - Helder, Marco N.
AU - ten Bruggenkate, Christiaan M.
AU - Bravenboer, Nathalie
AU - Klein-Nulend, Jenneke
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
PY - 2023/2
Y1 - 2023/2
N2 - Objectives: Mandibular retromolar (predominantly cortical) and maxillary tuberosity (predominantly cancellous) bone grafts are used in patients undergoing maxillary sinus floor elevation (MSFE) for dental implant placement. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to investigate whether differences exist in bone formation and vascularization after grafting with either bone source in patients undergoing MSFE. Methods: Fifteen patients undergoing MSFE were treated with retromolar (n = 9) or tuberosity (n = 6) bone grafts. Biopsies were taken 4 months postoperatively prior to dental implant placement, and histomorphometrically analyzed to quantify bone and osteoid area, number of total, apoptotic, and receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL)-positive osteocytes, small and large-sized blood vessels, and osteoclasts. The grafted area was divided in three regions (caudal-cranial): RI, RII, and RIII. Results: Bone volume was 40% (RII, RIII) higher and osteoid volume 10% (RII) lower in retromolar compared to tuberosity-grafted areas. Total osteocyte number and number of RANKL-positive osteocytes were 23% (RII) and 90% (RI, RII) lower, but osteoclast number was higher (retromolar: 12, tuberosity: 0) in retromolar-grafted areas. The total number of blood vessels was 80% (RI) to 60% (RIII) lower, while the percentage of large-sized blood vessels was 86% (RI) to 25% (RIII) higher in retromolar-grafted areas. Number of osteocyte lacunae and apoptotic osteocytes were similar in both bone grafts used. Conclusions: Compared to the retromolar bone, tuberosity bone showed increased bone vitality and vascularization in patients undergoing MSFE, likely due to faster bone remodeling or earlier start of new bone formation. Therefore, tuberosity bone grafts might perform better in enhancing bone regeneration.
AB - Objectives: Mandibular retromolar (predominantly cortical) and maxillary tuberosity (predominantly cancellous) bone grafts are used in patients undergoing maxillary sinus floor elevation (MSFE) for dental implant placement. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to investigate whether differences exist in bone formation and vascularization after grafting with either bone source in patients undergoing MSFE. Methods: Fifteen patients undergoing MSFE were treated with retromolar (n = 9) or tuberosity (n = 6) bone grafts. Biopsies were taken 4 months postoperatively prior to dental implant placement, and histomorphometrically analyzed to quantify bone and osteoid area, number of total, apoptotic, and receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL)-positive osteocytes, small and large-sized blood vessels, and osteoclasts. The grafted area was divided in three regions (caudal-cranial): RI, RII, and RIII. Results: Bone volume was 40% (RII, RIII) higher and osteoid volume 10% (RII) lower in retromolar compared to tuberosity-grafted areas. Total osteocyte number and number of RANKL-positive osteocytes were 23% (RII) and 90% (RI, RII) lower, but osteoclast number was higher (retromolar: 12, tuberosity: 0) in retromolar-grafted areas. The total number of blood vessels was 80% (RI) to 60% (RIII) lower, while the percentage of large-sized blood vessels was 86% (RI) to 25% (RIII) higher in retromolar-grafted areas. Number of osteocyte lacunae and apoptotic osteocytes were similar in both bone grafts used. Conclusions: Compared to the retromolar bone, tuberosity bone showed increased bone vitality and vascularization in patients undergoing MSFE, likely due to faster bone remodeling or earlier start of new bone formation. Therefore, tuberosity bone grafts might perform better in enhancing bone regeneration.
KW - autografts
KW - bone regeneration
KW - bone vitality
KW - mandibular bone
KW - maxillary bone
KW - maxillary sinus floor elevation
KW - vascularization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139426992&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85139426992&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13142
DO - https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13142
M3 - Article
C2 - 36214357
SN - 1523-0899
VL - 25
SP - 141
EP - 151
JO - Clinical and Experimental Dental Research
JF - Clinical and Experimental Dental Research
IS - 1
ER -