Cardioprotection against reperfusion injury is maximal with only two minutes of sevoflurane administration in rats

Detlef Obal, Horst Scharbatke, Holger Barthel, Benedikt Preckel, Jost Müllenheim, Wolfgang Schlack

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: Volatile anesthetics can protect the heart against reperfusion injury. When sevoflurane is given for the first 15 min of reperfusion, a concentration corresponding to one minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) provides a maximum protective effect. The present study addresses the question of how long sevoflurane has to be administered to achieve the best cardioprotection. METHODS: Chloralose anesthetized rats were subjected to a 25-min occlusion of a major coronary artery, followed by 90 min of reperfusion. During the initial phase of reperfusion, an end-tidal concentration of 2.4 vol.% of sevoflurane (1 MAC) was given for two (n = 8), five (n = 8) or ten minutes (n = 7). Seven rats served as untreated controls. We measured left ventricular (LV) pressure, mean aortic pressure and infarct size (triphenyltetrazolium staining). RESULTS: Administration of sevoflurane for two minutes resulted in the greatest reduction of infarct size to 15% (8-22 [mean (95% confidence interval)] of the area at risk compared with controls [51 (47-55) %, P < 0.001]. Five or ten minutes of sevoflurane administration reduced infarct size to 26 (18-34) and 26 (18-35) % [P < 0.05], respectively. The cardiodepressant effect of sevoflurane varied with the duration of its administration: LV dP/dt was reduced from 6332 mmHg x sec(-1) (5771-6894) during baseline to 4211 mmHg x sec(-1) (3031-5391), 3811 mmHg x sec(-1) (2081-5540) and 3612 mmHg x sec(-1) (2864-4359) after two, five and ten minutes of reperfusion, respectively. CONCLUSION: Administration of 1 MAC sevoflurane for the first two minutes of reperfusion effectively protects the heart against reperfusion injury in rats in vivo. A longer administration time had lesser cardioprotective effects in this experimental model
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)940-945
JournalCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthésie
Volume50
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Cite this