Challenges and lessons learned from a long-term postauthorisation safety study programme of rivaroxaban in Europe

Gunnar Brobert, Ana Ruigomez, Tania Schink, Annemarie Voss, Ron Herings, Elisabeth Smits, Karin M. A. Swart, Leif Friberg, Yanina Balabanova, Christine Tarenz, Kiliana Suzart-Woischnik, Montse Soriano-Gabarró, Pareen Vora, Martin Homering, Tomasz Dyszynski, Gerd Nagel, Pablo Amaya, Luis Alberto García Rodríguez

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe opportunities and challenges experienced from the four pharmacoepidemiological database studies included in the rivaroxaban post authorisation safety study (PASS) programme and propose ways to maximise the value of population-based observational research when addressing regulatory requirements. DESIGN: PASS programme of rivaroxaban carried out as part of the regulatory postapproval commitment to the European Medicines Agency. SETTING: Clinical practice in Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden and the UK (electronic health records)-undertaken by pharmacoepidemiology research teams using country-specific databases with different coding structures. PARTICIPANTS: 355 152 patients prescribed rivaroxaban and 338 199 patients prescribed vitamin K antagonists. RESULTS: Two major challenges that were encountered throughout the lengthy PASS programme were related to: (1) finalising country-tailored study designs before the extent of rivaroxaban uptake was known, and (2) new research questions that arose during the programme (eg, those relating to an evolving prescribing landscape). RECOMMENDATIONS: We advocate the following strategies to help address these major challenges (should they arise in any future PASS): conducting studies based on a common data model that enable the same analytical tools to be applied when using different databases; maintaining early, clear, continuous communication with the regulator (including discussing the potential benefit of studying drug use as a precursor to planning a safety study); consideration of adaptive designs whenever uncertainty exists and following an initial period of data collection; and setting milestones for the review of study objectives.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere081348
Pages (from-to)e081348
JournalBMJ Open
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Mar 2024

Keywords

  • Cardiology
  • EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES
  • Vascular medicine

Cite this