TY - JOUR
T1 - Changes in the Prevalence of Infection in Pregnant Women during the COVID-19 Lockdown
AU - Werter, Dominique E.
AU - Schuster, Heleen J.
AU - Schneeberger, Caroline
AU - Pajkrt, Eva
AU - de Groot, Christianne J. M.
AU - van Leeuwen, Elisabeth
AU - Kazemier, Brenda M.
N1 - Funding Information: This research was funded by a ‘Start small, Think big’ grant from the Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Board which was rewarded in 2021. Publisher Copyright: © 2023 by the authors.
PY - 2023/8/1
Y1 - 2023/8/1
N2 - Background: During the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2, strict mitigation measures and national lockdowns were implemented. Our objective was to investigate to what extent the prevalence of some infections in pregnancy was altered during different periods of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This was a single centre retrospective cohort study conducted in the Netherlands on data collected from electronic patient files of pregnant women from January 2017 to February 2021. We identified three time periods with different strictness of mitigation measures: the first and second lockdown were relatively strict; the inter-lockdown period was less strict. The prevalence of the different infections (Group B Streptococcus (GBS)-carriage, urinary tract infections and Cytomegalovirus infection) during the lockdown was compared to the same time periods in previous years (2017–2019). Results: In the first lockdown, there was a significant decrease in GBS-carriage (19.5% in 2017–2019 vs. 9.1% in 2020; p = 0.02). In the period following the first lockdown and during the second, no differences in prevalence were found. There was a trend towards an increase in positive Cytomegalovirus IgM during the inter-lockdown period (4.9% in 2017–2019 vs. 12.8% in 2020; p = 0.09), but this did not reach statistical significance. The number of positive urine cultures did not significantly change during the study period. Conclusions: During the first lockdown there was a reduction in GBS-carriage; further studies are warranted to look into the reason why.
AB - Background: During the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2, strict mitigation measures and national lockdowns were implemented. Our objective was to investigate to what extent the prevalence of some infections in pregnancy was altered during different periods of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This was a single centre retrospective cohort study conducted in the Netherlands on data collected from electronic patient files of pregnant women from January 2017 to February 2021. We identified three time periods with different strictness of mitigation measures: the first and second lockdown were relatively strict; the inter-lockdown period was less strict. The prevalence of the different infections (Group B Streptococcus (GBS)-carriage, urinary tract infections and Cytomegalovirus infection) during the lockdown was compared to the same time periods in previous years (2017–2019). Results: In the first lockdown, there was a significant decrease in GBS-carriage (19.5% in 2017–2019 vs. 9.1% in 2020; p = 0.02). In the period following the first lockdown and during the second, no differences in prevalence were found. There was a trend towards an increase in positive Cytomegalovirus IgM during the inter-lockdown period (4.9% in 2017–2019 vs. 12.8% in 2020; p = 0.09), but this did not reach statistical significance. The number of positive urine cultures did not significantly change during the study period. Conclusions: During the first lockdown there was a reduction in GBS-carriage; further studies are warranted to look into the reason why.
KW - COVID-19 lockdown
KW - cytomegalovirus
KW - group B-Streptococcus
KW - infections
KW - pregnancy
KW - urinary tract infections
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85169105515&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11081973
DO - https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11081973
M3 - Article
C2 - 37630533
SN - 2076-2607
VL - 11
JO - Microorganisms
JF - Microorganisms
IS - 8
M1 - 1973
ER -