Clinical Performance of the Low Profile Zenith Alpha Abdominal Endovascular Graft: 2 Year Results from the ZEPHYR Registry

Johannes Hatzl, Michiel van Basten Batenburg, Kak K. Yeung, Bram Fioole, Eric Verhoeven, Geert Lauwers, Tilo Kölbel, Jan J. Wever, Dierk Scheinert, Wouter van den Eynde, Guido Rouhani, Barend M. E. Mees, Frank Vermassen, Hubert Schelzig, Dittmar Böckler, Philippe W. M. Cuypers, Athanasios Katsargyris, Hans van Overhagen, Jurgen Verbist, Geert W. H. SchurinkRandolph G. Statius van Eps, Hugo T. C. Veger, ZEPHYR Study Group Collaborators

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: The midterm outcomes of the low profile Zenith Alpha Abdominal Endovascular Graft from the ZEnith alPHa for aneurYsm Repair (ZEPHYR) registry are reported. Methods: The ZEPHYR registry is a physician initiated, multicentre, non-randomised, core laboratory controlled, prospective registry. Inclusion criteria were patients with a non-ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm with a maximum diameter ≥ 50 mm or enlargement > 5 mm within 6 months, with a site reported infrarenal neck length of ≥ 10 mm and with the intention to electively implant the Zenith Alpha abdominal endograft. Patients from 14 sites across Germany, Belgium, and the Netherlands were included. The primary endpoint was treatment success, defined as technical success and clinical success. Technical success was defined as successful delivery and deployment of the endograft in the planned position without unintentional coverage of internal iliac or renal arteries, with successful removal of the delivery system. Clinical success was defined as freedom from aneurysm sac expansion > 5 mm, type I or type III endoleaks, aneurysm rupture, stent graft migration > 10 mm, open conversion, and stent graft occlusion. Results: Three hundred and forty-seven patients were included in the ZEPHYR registry. The median clinical follow up was 743 days (interquartile range [IQR] 657, 806) with a median imaging follow up of 725 days (IQR 408, 788). Treatment success at 6 months, 1, and 2 years was 92.5%, 90.4%, and 85.3%, respectively. Freedom from secondary intervention was 94.3%, 93.4%, and 86.9%, respectively. The predominant reason for secondary intervention was limb complications. Freedom from limb occlusion (per patient) at 6 months, 1, and 2 years was 97.2%, 95.8%, and 92.5%, respectively. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses could not identify any independent predictor for limb complications. Conclusion: While treatment success is comparable with other commercially available grafts, the rate of limb complications at 2 years is of concern. The manufacturer's instructions for use should be followed closely. Further studies are necessary to investigate the root cause of the increased rate of limb complications with the Zenith Alpha Abdominal Endovascular Graft.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Early online date2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2024

Keywords

  • AAA
  • Abdominal aortic aneurysm
  • EVAR
  • Endovascular
  • Endovascular aneurysm repair

Cite this