Clopidogrel in noncarriers of CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles versus ticagrelor in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome: A pre-specified sub analysis from the POPular Genetics and POPular Age trials CYP2C19 alleles in elderly patients

Daniel M F Claassens, Marieke E Gimbel, Thomas O Bergmeijer, Gerrit J A Vos, Renicus S Hermanides, Pim van der Harst, Emanuele Barbato, Carmine Morisco, Richard M Tjon Joe Gin, Evelyn A de Vrey, Ton A C M Heestermans, J Wouter Jukema, Clemens von Birgelen, Reinier A Waalewijn, Sjoerd H Hofma, Frank R den Hartog, Michiel Voskuil, Arnoud W J Van't Hof, Folkert W Asselbergs, A MosterdJean-Paul R Herrman, Willem Dewilde, Bakhtawar K Mahmoodi, Vera H M Deneer, Jurriën M Ten Berg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who are carrying CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles derive less benefit from clopidogrel treatment. Despite this, in elderly patients, clopidogrel might be preferred over more potent P2Y12 inhibitors due to a lower bleeding risk. Whether CYP2C19 genotype-guided antiplatelet treatment in the elderly could be of benefit has not been studied specifically.

METHODS: Patients aged 70 years and older with known CYP2C19*2 and *3 genotype were identified from the POPular Genetics and POPular Age trials. Noncarriers of loss-of-function alleles treated with clopidogrel were compared to patients, irrespective of CYP2C19 genotype, treated with ticagrelor and to clopidogrel treated carriers of loss-of-function alleles. We assessed net clinical benefit (all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke and Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) major bleeding), atherothrombotic outcomes (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke) and bleeding outcomes (PLATO major and minor bleeding).

RESULTS: A total of 991 patients were assessed. There was no significant difference in net clinical benefit (17.2% vs. 15.1%, adjusted hazard ratio (adjHR) 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77-1.44), atherothrombotic outcomes (9.7% vs. 9.2%, adjHR 1.00, 95%CI 0.66-1.50), and bleeding outcomes (17.7% vs. 19.8%, adjHR 0.80, 95%CI 0.62-1.12) between clopidogrel in noncarriers of loss-of-function alleles and ticagrelor respectively.

CONCLUSION: In ACS patients aged 70 years and older, there was no significant difference in net clinical benefit and atherothrombotic outcomes between noncarriers of a loss-of-function allele treated with clopidogrel and patients treated with ticagrelor. The bleeding rate was numerically; though not statistically significant, lower in patients using clopidogrel.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)10-17
Number of pages8
JournalInternational journal of cardiology
Volume334
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnosis
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Alleles
  • Clopidogrel/therapeutic use
  • Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19/genetics
  • Genotype
  • Humans
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
  • Ticagrelor
  • Treatment Outcome

Cite this