TY - JOUR
T1 - Colchicine and diabetes in patients with chronic coronary artery disease
T2 - insights from the LoDoCo2 randomized controlled trial
AU - Mohammadnia, Niekbachsh
AU - Los, Jan
AU - Opstal, Tjerk S. J.
AU - Fiolet, Aernoud T. L.
AU - Eikelboom, John W.
AU - Mosterd, Arend
AU - Nidorf, Stefan M.
AU - Budgeon, Charley A.
AU - Tijssen, Jan G. P.
AU - Thompson, Peter L.
AU - Tack, Cees J.
AU - Simsek, Suat
AU - Bax, Willem A.
AU - Cornel, Jan H.
AU - el Messaoudi, Saloua
N1 - Funding Information: The LoDoCo2 trial was supported by the National Health Medical Research Council of Australia, a grant from the Sir Charles Gairdner Research Advisory Committee, the Withering Foundation the Netherlands, the Netherlands Heart Foundation, the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development, and a consortium of Teva, Disphar, and Tiofarma in the Netherlands. Acknowledgments Publisher Copyright: 2023 Mohammadnia, Los, Opstal, Fiolet, Eikelboom, Mosterd, Nidorf, Budgeon, Tijssen, Thompson, Tack, Simsek, Bax, Cornel and El Messaoudi.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Introduction: Despite optimal treatment, patients with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) and diabetes mellitus (DM) are at high risk of cardiovascular events, emphasizing the need for new treatment options. The Low-Dose Colchicine 2 (LoDoCo2) trial demonstrated that colchicine reduces cardiovascular risk in patients with chronic CAD. This analysis determines the efficacy of colchicine in patients with chronic CAD and DM as well as the effect of colchicine on the development of new-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: The LoDoCo2 trial randomized 5,522 patients to placebo or colchicine 0.5 mg once daily, with a median follow-up of 28.6 months. The primary composite endpoint was cardiovascular death, spontaneous myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or ischemia-driven revascularization. The effect of its treatment in patients with and without DM was evaluated by including an interaction term in the model. Results: A total of 1,007 participants (18.2%) had T2DM at baseline. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) [(95% confidence interval (CI)] for the primary endpoint in the T2DM group was 1.52 (1.15–2.01, p < 0.01) compared with the group without T2DM. The HR for the treatment effect on the primary endpoint was 0.87 (0.61–1.25) in participants with T2DM and 0.64 (0.51–0.80) in participants without diabetes (pinteraction= 0.14). The incidence of new-onset T2DM was 1.5% (34 out of 2,270) in the colchicine group and 2.2% (49 out of 2,245) in the placebo group (p = 0.10). Discussion: In conclusion, based on the current evidence, the beneficial effects of colchicine on cardiovascular endpoints are consistent regardless of DM status. The potential benefits of colchicine in preventing new-onset DM need further investigation. These findings are only hypothesis-generating and require larger prospective trials to confirm the results.
AB - Introduction: Despite optimal treatment, patients with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) and diabetes mellitus (DM) are at high risk of cardiovascular events, emphasizing the need for new treatment options. The Low-Dose Colchicine 2 (LoDoCo2) trial demonstrated that colchicine reduces cardiovascular risk in patients with chronic CAD. This analysis determines the efficacy of colchicine in patients with chronic CAD and DM as well as the effect of colchicine on the development of new-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: The LoDoCo2 trial randomized 5,522 patients to placebo or colchicine 0.5 mg once daily, with a median follow-up of 28.6 months. The primary composite endpoint was cardiovascular death, spontaneous myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or ischemia-driven revascularization. The effect of its treatment in patients with and without DM was evaluated by including an interaction term in the model. Results: A total of 1,007 participants (18.2%) had T2DM at baseline. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) [(95% confidence interval (CI)] for the primary endpoint in the T2DM group was 1.52 (1.15–2.01, p < 0.01) compared with the group without T2DM. The HR for the treatment effect on the primary endpoint was 0.87 (0.61–1.25) in participants with T2DM and 0.64 (0.51–0.80) in participants without diabetes (pinteraction= 0.14). The incidence of new-onset T2DM was 1.5% (34 out of 2,270) in the colchicine group and 2.2% (49 out of 2,245) in the placebo group (p = 0.10). Discussion: In conclusion, based on the current evidence, the beneficial effects of colchicine on cardiovascular endpoints are consistent regardless of DM status. The potential benefits of colchicine in preventing new-onset DM need further investigation. These findings are only hypothesis-generating and require larger prospective trials to confirm the results.
KW - colchicine
KW - coronary artery disease
KW - diabetes mellitus
KW - inflammation
KW - prevention
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85174816039&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1244529
DO - https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1244529
M3 - Article
C2 - 37868776
SN - 2297-055X
VL - 10
JO - Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine
JF - Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine
M1 - 1244529
ER -