Comparing clean intermittent catheterisation and transurethral indwelling catheterisation for incomplete voiding after vaginal prolapse surgery Reply

R. A. Hakvoort; J. P. Roovers

doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03256.x

Comparing clean intermittent catheterisation and transurethral indwelling catheterisation for incomplete voiding after vaginal prolapse surgery Reply

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	635
Journal	BJOG
Volume	119
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03256.x
Publication status	Published - 2012

Access to Document

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03256.x

Cite this

@article{880e355b7cc64b9fb1228491c7b9940d,

title = "Comparing clean intermittent catheterisation and transurethral indwelling catheterisation for incomplete voiding after vaginal prolapse surgery Reply",

author = "Hakvoort, {R. A.} and Roovers, {J. P.}",

year = "2012",

doi = "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03256.x",

language = "English",

volume = "119",

pages = "635",

journal = "BJOG",

issn = "1470-0328",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing clean intermittent catheterisation and transurethral indwelling catheterisation for incomplete voiding after vaginal prolapse surgery Reply

AU - Hakvoort, R. A.

AU - Roovers, J. P.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03256.x

DO - https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03256.x

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

SN - 1470-0328

VL - 119

SP - 635

JO - BJOG

JF - BJOG

IS - 5

ER -