Comparison of the parasitologic efficacy of amodiaquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine in the treatment of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in the Bungoma district of western Kenya

C. J. Vreugdenhil, F. Y. Scheper, S. R. Hoogstraatte, M. Smolders, S. Gikunda, F. G. Cobelens, P. A. Kager

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The efficacy of amodiaquine (AQ) and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) was assessed in 31, 0 symptomatic children from western Kenya with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. A non-blinded, randomized, 14-day study was performed and parasitologic criteria were used. Of 310 patients included, 238 (77%) completed the study: 120 received AQ and 118 received SP. In those treated with AQ, there were sensitive (S) infections in 107 patients (89.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 82.2, 94.1%), RI resistance in 10 (8.3%, 95% CI = 4.1, 14.8%), RII resistance in 1 (0.8%, 95% CI = 0, 4.6%), and RIII resistance in 2 (1.7%, 95% CI = 0.2,5.9%). In those treated with SP, there were S infections in 74 patients (62.7%, 95% CI = 53.3, 71.4%), RI resistance in 21 (17.8%, 95% CI = 11.4, 25.9%), RII resistance in 11 (9.3%, 95% CI = 4.7,16.1%), and RIII resistance in 12 (10.2%, 95% CI = 5.4,17.1%). Resistance rates were consistently higher in the SP-treated patients (P <0.001). Resistance to SP in this area has reached such levels that it should no longer be the first-line treatment. Alternative treatment, such as SP plus AQ combination treatment or artemisinin combination treatment, is urgently needed
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)537-541
JournalAmerican journal of tropical medicine and hygiene
Volume71
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Cite this