Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography in Acute Pulmonary Embolism: The Effect of a Computer-assisted Detection Prototype Used as a Concurrent Reader

Rianne Wittenberg, Joost F. Peters, Inge A. H. van den Berk, Nicole J. M. Freling, Rutger Lely, Bartjan de Hoop, Karin Horsthuis, Cécile J. Ravesloot, Michael Weber, W. Mathias Prokop, Cornelia M. Schaefer-Prokop, R.J. Lelij

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the effect of computer-assisted detection (CAD) on diagnostic accuracy, reader confidence, and reading time when used as a concurrent reader for the detection of acute pulmonary embolism in computed tomography pulmonary angiography.Materials and Methods: In this institutional review board-approved retrospective study, 6 observers with varying experience evaluated 158 negative and 38 positive consecutive computed tomography pulmonary angiographies (mean patient age 60 y; 115 women) without and with CAD as a concurrent reader. Readers were asked to determine the presence of pulmonary embolism, assess their diagnostic confidence using a 5-point scale, and document their reading time. Results were compared with an independent standard established by 2 readers, and a third chest radiologist was consulted in case of discordant findings.Results: Using logistic regression for repeated measurements, we found a significant increase in readers' sensitivity (P <0.001) without loss of specificity (P=0.855) with the effects being reader dependent (P <0.001). Sensitivities varied from 68% to 100% without CAD and from 76% to 100% with CAD. A 2-way analysis of variance showed a small but significant decrease in reading time (P <0.001), with the duration varying between 24 and 208 seconds without CAD and between 17 and 196 seconds with CAD, and a significant increase in readers' confidence scores using CAD as a concurrent reader (P <0.001).Conclusions: CAD as a concurrent reader has the potential to increase readers' sensitivity and confidence with a decrease in reading time without loss of specificity. The differences between readers, however, require further evaluation of CAD as a concurrent reader in a larger trial before stronger conclusions can be drawn
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)315-321
JournalJournal of thoracic imaging
Volume28
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Cite this