TY - JOUR
T1 - Corrigendum to "Pharmacological prevention and treatment of opioid-induced constipation in cancer patients
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis” [Cancer Treat. Rev. 125 (2024) 102704] (Cancer Treatment Reviews (2024) 125, (S0305737224000227), (10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102704))
AU - Kistemaker, K R J
AU - Sijani, F
AU - Brinkman, D J
AU - de Graeff, A
AU - Burchell, G L
AU - Steegers, M A H
AU - van Zuylen, L
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)
PY - 2024/6
Y1 - 2024/6
N2 - The authors regret that in the abstract of the article an incorrect mean difference in Bowel Function Index between oxycodone/naloxone and oxycodone with laxatives is described in the results. In the abstract a mean difference of −13.68 (95 % CI −18.38 to −8.98; I 2 = 58 %) is described, where it should be −13.79 (95 % CI −18.50- to −9.08; I 2 = 34 %). In the rest of the article the mean difference is mentioned correctly, as can be seen in figure 2 and in the results section on page 4 (last paragraph). Since it is a very small difference (0.11 points on a scale of 0 to 100), it does not change the interpretation of the results. Also the interpretation of the heterogeneity, represented by the I 2 statistic, is not different, since values of 30–60 % suggest moderate heterogeneity. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
AB - The authors regret that in the abstract of the article an incorrect mean difference in Bowel Function Index between oxycodone/naloxone and oxycodone with laxatives is described in the results. In the abstract a mean difference of −13.68 (95 % CI −18.38 to −8.98; I 2 = 58 %) is described, where it should be −13.79 (95 % CI −18.50- to −9.08; I 2 = 34 %). In the rest of the article the mean difference is mentioned correctly, as can be seen in figure 2 and in the results section on page 4 (last paragraph). Since it is a very small difference (0.11 points on a scale of 0 to 100), it does not change the interpretation of the results. Also the interpretation of the heterogeneity, represented by the I 2 statistic, is not different, since values of 30–60 % suggest moderate heterogeneity. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85191335608&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102738
DO - 10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102738
M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor
C2 - 38678643
SN - 0305-7372
VL - 127
SP - 102738
JO - Cancer Treatment Reviews
JF - Cancer Treatment Reviews
M1 - 102738
ER -