Corrigendum to ‘Salivary gland cancer: ESMO–European Reference Network on Rare Adult Solid Cancers (EURACAN) Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up’: [ESMO Open 7(6):100602, December 2022] (ESMO Open (2022) 7(6), (S2059702922002320), (10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100602))

ESMO Guidelines Committee

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorAcademic

Abstract

The authors regret that there were errors in the text and published figures. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. The corrections are as follows: On page 3, in Figure 1, an option is added after “cT1-T2, N0”: • High gradecThis option then connects with the box containing “CT of the chest FDG–PET–CT [III, A]”. On page 3, in Figure 1 and the figure footnote, a new footnote ‘b’ is added to the following boxes: • cT3-T4, N0 or AdCC any stageb• cT1-T2, N0bb bFDG–PET–CT is recommended for treatment planning in lymph node-positive or high-grade SGC; otherwise, CT of the chest can suffice.On page 3, in Figure 1 and the figure footnote, a new footnote ‘c’ is added to the following box: • High gradecc cDefinition of high-grade tumours is described in Section 1 of the Supplementary Material, available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100602. On page 3: • FDG–PET–CT is recommended in high-grade SGC for the detection of distant metastases [III, A].is replaced with: • FDG–PET–CT is recommended in high-grade or lymph-node positive SGC for the detection of distant metastases [III, A]. On page 5, in Figure 2: • No high-risk factors: RT to primary [IV, A]is replaced with: • High-risk factors: RT to primary [IV, A]On page 5, in Figure 2: • RT to neckis replaced with: • RT to level I-V for pN+ [IV, A]and an arrow is added between the box containing “END II-IV (I and V on indication) [IV, B] and the box containing “pN0”. On page 5, in Figure 2: • pN+ and no high-risk factors: RT to level I-V [IV, A]is replaced with an arrow to the box containing “RT to level I-V for pN+ [IV, A]”. On page 6, in Figure 3, an additional option is added following “Open approach [IV, A]” and “Selected transoral/endoscopic/robotic [V, A]”: • High-risk factors: RT to primary [IV, A] On page 8, in Figure 4, an additional option is added following “Resection of submandibular gland and level Ib [IV, B]”: • pN+with arrows connecting to “Comprehensive ND I-V including the primary [IV, A]” and “RT to level I-V [IV, A]”. On page 8, in Figure 4: • pN0: No additional treatmentis replaced with: • pN0with an arrow connecting to: • High-risk factors: RT to primary [IV, A] On page 9, before the recommendations of “Surgical management of the primary: submandibular gland cancer” the following text is added: • Surgical management of the primary: minor SGC and cancer of the sublingual gland o Depending on the anatomical site of origin, a classical open approach [IV, A] or endoscopic, transoral or combined transoral-endoscopic resection [V, A] are recommended in selected patients, with the aim of achieving free margins. On page 10: • In case of R/M disease, systemic treatment is challenging but can be urgent, depending on tumour subtype and behaviour. For all types of SGC with distant metastases (71% of patients will present or develop R/M disease), median OS is 15 months and 1-, 3- and 5-year OS rates are 54.5%, 28.4% and 14.8%, respectively.is replaced with: • In case of R/M disease, systemic treatment is challenging but can be urgent, depending on tumour subtype and behaviour. For all types of SGC with distant metastases (up to 60% of patients will present or develop R/M disease), median OS is 15 months and 1-, 3- and 5-year OS rates are 54.5%, 28.4% and 14.8%, respectively.
Original languageEnglish
Article number101630
JournalESMO open
Volume8
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2023

Cite this