Abstract
The authors regret The conclusion of the abstract reads: “The expected 10-year revision rate of contemporary ankle prostheses is lower than the current benchmark for hip prostheses”. It should read (emphasis added for clarity): “The expected 10-year revision rate of contemporary ankle prostheses is higher than the current benchmark for hip prostheses”. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. DOI of original article: 10.1016/j.fas.2021.05.014
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 177 |
Number of pages | 1 |
Journal | Foot and Ankle Surgery |
Volume | 29 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs |
|
Publication status | Published - 1 Feb 2023 |