Cost-effectiveness of a participatory return-to-work intervention for temporary agency workers and unemployed workers sick-listed due to musculoskeletal disorders: design of a randomised controlled trial

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Within the working population there is a vulnerable group: workers without an employment contract and workers with a flexible labour market arrangement, e.g. temporary agency workers. In most cases, when sick-listed, these workers have no workplace/employer to return to. Also, for these workers access to occupational health care is limited or even absent in many countries. For this vulnerable working population there is a need for tailor-made occupational health care, including the presence of an actual return-to-work perspective. Therefore, a participatory return-to-work program has been developed based on a successful return-to-work intervention for workers, sick-listed due to low back pain.The objective of this paper is to describe the design of a randomised controlled trial to study the (cost-)effectiveness of this newly developed participatory return-to-work program adapted for temporary agency workers and unemployed workers, sick-listed due to musculoskeletal disorders, compared to usual care.

METHODS/DESIGN: The design of this study is a randomised controlled trial with one year of follow-up. The study population consists of temporary agency workers and unemployed workers sick-listed between 2 and 8 weeks due to musculoskeletal disorders. The new return-to-work program is a stepwise program aimed at making a consensus-based return-to-work implementation plan with the possibility of a (therapeutic) workplace to return-to-work. Outcomes are measured at baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. The primary outcome measure is duration of the sickness benefit period after the first day of reporting sick. Secondary outcome measures are: time until first return-to-work, total number of days of sickness benefit during follow-up; functional status; intensity of musculoskeletal pain; pain coping; and attitude, social influence and self-efficacy determinants. Cost-benefit is evaluated from an insurer's perspective. A process evaluation is part of this study.

DISCUSSION: For sick-listed workers without an employment contract there can be gained a lot by improving occupational health care, including return-to-work guidance, and by minimising the 'labour market handicap' by creating a return-to-work perspective. In addition, reduction of sickness absence and work disability, i.e. a reduction of disability claims, may result in substantial benefits for the Dutch Social Security System.

TRIAL REGISTRATION:

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR1047.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)60
Number of pages14
JournalBMC musculoskeletal disorders
Volume11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Mar 2010

Keywords

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Clinical Trials as Topic/methods
  • Cost of Illness
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis/methods
  • Disability Evaluation
  • Disabled Persons/rehabilitation
  • Health Care Costs
  • Health Services Needs and Demand/economics
  • Humans
  • Insurance, Disability
  • Middle Aged
  • Musculoskeletal Diseases/economics
  • National Health Programs/standards
  • Netherlands
  • Occupational Diseases/economics
  • Occupational Health Services/economics
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care/economics
  • Program Development/economics
  • Program Evaluation/economics
  • Rehabilitation, Vocational/economics
  • Self Efficacy
  • Sick Leave/legislation & jurisprudence
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Unemployment/statistics & numerical data
  • Work Capacity Evaluation
  • Workload/economics
  • Young Adult

Cite this