Cost-effectiveness of ursodeoxycholic acid in preventing new-onset symptomatic gallstone disease after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery

Sylke Haal, Maimoena S. S. Guman, L. Maurits de Brauw, Ruben Schouten, Ruben N. van Veen, Paul Fockens, Victor E. A. Gerdes, Rogier P. Voermans, Marcel G. W. Dijkgraaf

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The aim was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and cost–utility of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) prophylaxis for the prevention of symptomatic gallstone disease after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in patients without gallstones before surgery. Methods: Data from a multicentre, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled superiority trial were used. Patients scheduled for laparoscopic RYGB or sleeve gastrectomy were randomized to receive 900 mg UDCA or placebo for 6 months. Indicated by the clinical report, prophylactic prescription of UDCA was evaluated economically against placebo from a healthcare and societal perspective for the subgroup of patients without gallstones before surgery who underwent RYGB. Volumes and costs of in-hospital care, out-of-hospital care, out-of-pocket expenses, and productivity loss were assessed. Main outcomes were the costs per patient free from symptomatic gallstone disease and the costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Results: Patients receiving UDCA prophylaxis were more likely to remain free from symptomatic gallstone disease (relative risk 1.06, 95 per cent c.i. 1.02 to 1.11; P = 0.002) compared with patients in the placebo group. The gain in QALYs, corrected for a baseline difference in health utility, was 0.047 (95 per cent bias-corrected and accelerated (Bca) c.i. 0.007 to 0.088) higher (P = 0.022). Differences in costs were – €356 (95 per cent Bca c.i. €–1573 to 761) from a healthcare perspective and –€1392 (–3807 to 917) from a societal perspective including out-of-pocket expenses and productivity loss, both statistically non-significant, in favour of UDCA prophylaxis. The probability of UDCA prophylaxis being cost-effective was at least 0.872. Conclusion: UDCA prophylaxis after RYGB in patients without gallstones before surgery was cost-effective.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1116-1123
Number of pages8
JournalBritish Journal of Surgery
Volume109
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2022

Keywords

  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Gallstones/prevention & control
  • Gastrectomy
  • Gastric Bypass
  • Humans
  • Obesity, Morbid/complications
  • Ursodeoxycholic Acid/therapeutic use

Cite this