Current state of and needs for hepatitis B screening: Results of a large screening study in a low-prevalent, metropolitan region

Julie Bottero, Anders Boyd, Maud Lemoine, Fabrice Carrat, Joel Gozlan, Anne Collignon, Nicolas Boo, Philippe Dhotte, Brigitte Varsat, Gerard Muller, Olivier Cha, Nadia Valin, Jean Nau, Pauline Campa, Benjamin Silbermann, Marc Bary, Pierre-Marie Girard, Karine Lacombe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: In low hepatitis B virus (HBV)-prevalent countries, most HBV-infected persons are unaware of their status. We aimed to evaluate whether (i) previous HBV-testing, (ii) physicians decision to screen, and (iii) CDC's recommendations identified infected individuals and which risk-factor groups needing testing. Methods: During a mass, multi-center HBV-screening study from September 2010-August 2011, 3929 participants were screened for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), anti-HBs and anti-Hepatitis B core antibodies (anti-HBcAb). Questions on HBV risk-factors and testing practices were asked to participants, while participants' eligibility for HBV-testing was asked to study medical professionals. Results: 85 (2.2%) participants were HBsAg-positive, while 659 (16.8%) had either resolved HBV infection or isolated anti- HBcAb. When comparing practices, HBV-testing was more likely to occur in HBV-infected participants if Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations were used (Sensitivity = 100%, 95%CI: 95.8-100) than physicians' discretion (Sensitivity = 87.1%, 95%CI: 78.0-93.4) or previous HBV-test (Sensitivity = 36.5%, 95%CI: 26.3-47.6) (p<0.0001). Nevertheless, many non-infected individuals would still have been screened using CDC-recommendations (Specificity = 31.1%, 95%CI: 29.6-32.6). Using multivariable logistic regression, HBsAg-positive status was significantly associated with the following: males, originating from high HBV-endemic region, contact with HBV-infected individual, without national healthcare, and intravenous-drug user (IDU). Of these risk-factors, physician's discretion for testing HBV was not significantly associated with participants' geographical origin or IDU. Conclusions: Missed opportunities of HBV-screening are largely due to underestimating country of origin as a risk-factor. Applying CDC-recommendations could improve HBV-screening, but with the disadvantage of many tests. Further development of HBV-testing strategies is necessary, especially before severe disease occurs. © 2014 Bottero et al.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere92266
Pages (from-to)e92266
JournalPLOS ONE
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Mar 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.
  • Cities/epidemiology
  • Female
  • Health Services Needs and Demand/statistics & numerical data
  • Hepatitis B Surface Antigens/blood
  • Hepatitis B/blood
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data
  • Middle Aged
  • Physicians
  • Prevalence
  • Risk Factors
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • United States

Cite this