TY - JOUR
T1 - Dengue in travellers: applicability of the 1975-1997 and the 2009 WHO classification system of dengue fever
AU - Wieten, Rosanne W.
AU - Vlietstra, Wytze
AU - Goorhuis, Abraham
AU - van Vugt, Michèle
AU - Hodiamont, Caspar J.
AU - Leenstra, Tjalling
AU - de Vries, Peter J.
AU - Janssen, Saskia
AU - van Thiel, Pieter P.
AU - Stijnis, Kees
AU - Grobusch, Martin P.
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Objectives The aim of this study was to assess the applicability and benefits of the new WHO dengue fever guidelines in clinical practice, for returning travellers. Methods We compared differences in specificity and sensitivity between the old and the new guidelines for diagnosing dengue and assessed the usefulness in predicting the clinical course of the disease. Also, we investigated whether hypertension, diabetes or allergies, ethnicity or high age influenced the course of disease. Results In our setting, the old classification, compared with the new, had a marginally higher sensitivity for diagnosing dengue. The new classification had a slightly higher specificity and was less rigid. Patients with dengue who had warning signs as postulated in the new classification were admitted more often than those who had no warning signs (RR, 8.09 [1.8035.48]). We did not find ethnicity, age, hypertension, diabetes mellitus or allergies to be predictive of the clinical course. Conclusions In our cohort of returned travellers, the new classification system did not differ in sensitivity and specificity from the old system to a clinically relevant degree. The guidelines did not improve identification of severe disease
AB - Objectives The aim of this study was to assess the applicability and benefits of the new WHO dengue fever guidelines in clinical practice, for returning travellers. Methods We compared differences in specificity and sensitivity between the old and the new guidelines for diagnosing dengue and assessed the usefulness in predicting the clinical course of the disease. Also, we investigated whether hypertension, diabetes or allergies, ethnicity or high age influenced the course of disease. Results In our setting, the old classification, compared with the new, had a marginally higher sensitivity for diagnosing dengue. The new classification had a slightly higher specificity and was less rigid. Patients with dengue who had warning signs as postulated in the new classification were admitted more often than those who had no warning signs (RR, 8.09 [1.8035.48]). We did not find ethnicity, age, hypertension, diabetes mellitus or allergies to be predictive of the clinical course. Conclusions In our cohort of returned travellers, the new classification system did not differ in sensitivity and specificity from the old system to a clinically relevant degree. The guidelines did not improve identification of severe disease
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2012.03020.x
DO - https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2012.03020.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 22686428
SN - 1360-2276
VL - 17
SP - 1023
EP - 1030
JO - Tropical Medicine & International Health
JF - Tropical Medicine & International Health
IS - 8
ER -