Development, validation and clinical usefulness of a prognostic model for relapse in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

Konstantina Chalkou, Ewout Steyerberg, Patrick Bossuyt, Suvitha Subramaniam, Pascal Benkert, Jens Kuhle, Giulio Disanto, Ludwig Kappos, Chiara Zecca, Matthias Egger, Georgia Salanti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prognosis for the occurrence of relapses in individuals with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), the most common subtype of multiple sclerosis (MS), could support individualized decisions and disease management and could be helpful for efficiently selecting patients for future randomized clinical trials. There are only three previously published prognostic models on this, all of them with important methodological shortcomings.

OBJECTIVES: We aim to present the development, internal validation, and evaluation of the potential clinical benefit of a prognostic model for relapses for individuals with RRMS using real-world data.

METHODS: We followed seven steps to develop and validate the prognostic model: (1) selection of prognostic factors via a review of the literature, (2) development of a generalized linear mixed-effects model in a Bayesian framework, (3) examination of sample size efficiency, (4) shrinkage of the coefficients, (5) dealing with missing data using multiple imputations, (6) internal validation of the model. Finally, we evaluated the potential clinical benefit of the developed prognostic model using decision curve analysis. For the development and the validation of our prognostic model, we followed the TRIPOD statement.

RESULTS: We selected eight baseline prognostic factors: age, sex, prior MS treatment, months since last relapse, disease duration, number of prior relapses, expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score, and number of gadolinium-enhanced lesions. We also developed a web application that calculates an individual's probability of relapsing within the next 2 years. The optimism-corrected c-statistic is 0.65 and the optimism-corrected calibration slope is 0.92. For threshold probabilities between 15 and 30%, the "treat based on the prognostic model" strategy leads to the highest net benefit and hence is considered the most clinically useful strategy.

CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic model we developed offers several advantages in comparison to previously published prognostic models on RRMS. Importantly, we assessed the potential clinical benefit to better quantify the clinical impact of the model. Our web application, once externally validated in the future, could be used by patients and doctors to calculate the individualized probability of relapsing within 2 years and to inform the management of their disease.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)17
JournalDiagnostic and Prognostic Research
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Oct 2021

Cite this