Differences in the experience of fatigue in patients and healthy controls: patients' descriptions

Marieke F. Gielissen; Hans Knoop; Petra Servaes; Joke S. Kalkman; Marcus J. Huibers; Stans Verhagen; Gijs Bleijenberg

doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-5-36

Differences in the experience of fatigue in patients and healthy controls: patients' descriptions

Marieke F. Gielissen, Hans Knoop, Petra Servaes, Joke S. Kalkman, Marcus J. Huibers, Stans Verhagen, Gijs Bleijenberg

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: the primary objective was to develop an adjective checklist, the Fatigue Quality List (FQL), aimed at assessing different perceptions of fatigue. Methods: 961 participants filled out the FQL (28 adjectives). A component and confirmatory factor analyses were performed and psychometric properties were evaluated. Differences on factor scores between different patients' groups were investigated and pre-and post treatment scores were compared in demonstrating change of perceptions after treatment of fatigue. Results: Four independent factors were found with adequate psychometric properties. Different perceptions were found between the patients' groups. Patients who were recovered after treatment for fatigue showed similar scores on the factors as healthy controls. Conclusion: The FQL appears to be a promising tool in measuring different perceptions of fatigue, which can be especially interesting for clinical practice

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	36
Journal	Health and quality of life outcomes
Volume	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-5-36
Publication status	Published - 2007
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-5-36

Cite this

@article{33347863d8c74491a27abc86b784da87,

title = "Differences in the experience of fatigue in patients and healthy controls: patients' descriptions",

abstract = "Background: the primary objective was to develop an adjective checklist, the Fatigue Quality List (FQL), aimed at assessing different perceptions of fatigue. Methods: 961 participants filled out the FQL (28 adjectives). A component and confirmatory factor analyses were performed and psychometric properties were evaluated. Differences on factor scores between different patients' groups were investigated and pre-and post treatment scores were compared in demonstrating change of perceptions after treatment of fatigue. Results: Four independent factors were found with adequate psychometric properties. Different perceptions were found between the patients' groups. Patients who were recovered after treatment for fatigue showed similar scores on the factors as healthy controls. Conclusion: The FQL appears to be a promising tool in measuring different perceptions of fatigue, which can be especially interesting for clinical practice",

author = "Gielissen, {Marieke F.} and Hans Knoop and Petra Servaes and Kalkman, {Joke S.} and Huibers, {Marcus J.} and Stans Verhagen and Gijs Bleijenberg",

year = "2007",

doi = "https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-5-36",

language = "English",

volume = "5",

pages = "36",

journal = "Health and quality of life outcomes",

issn = "1477-7525",

publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differences in the experience of fatigue in patients and healthy controls: patients' descriptions

AU - Gielissen, Marieke F.

AU - Knoop, Hans

AU - Servaes, Petra

AU - Kalkman, Joke S.

AU - Huibers, Marcus J.

AU - Verhagen, Stans

AU - Bleijenberg, Gijs

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Background: the primary objective was to develop an adjective checklist, the Fatigue Quality List (FQL), aimed at assessing different perceptions of fatigue. Methods: 961 participants filled out the FQL (28 adjectives). A component and confirmatory factor analyses were performed and psychometric properties were evaluated. Differences on factor scores between different patients' groups were investigated and pre-and post treatment scores were compared in demonstrating change of perceptions after treatment of fatigue. Results: Four independent factors were found with adequate psychometric properties. Different perceptions were found between the patients' groups. Patients who were recovered after treatment for fatigue showed similar scores on the factors as healthy controls. Conclusion: The FQL appears to be a promising tool in measuring different perceptions of fatigue, which can be especially interesting for clinical practice

AB - Background: the primary objective was to develop an adjective checklist, the Fatigue Quality List (FQL), aimed at assessing different perceptions of fatigue. Methods: 961 participants filled out the FQL (28 adjectives). A component and confirmatory factor analyses were performed and psychometric properties were evaluated. Differences on factor scores between different patients' groups were investigated and pre-and post treatment scores were compared in demonstrating change of perceptions after treatment of fatigue. Results: Four independent factors were found with adequate psychometric properties. Different perceptions were found between the patients' groups. Patients who were recovered after treatment for fatigue showed similar scores on the factors as healthy controls. Conclusion: The FQL appears to be a promising tool in measuring different perceptions of fatigue, which can be especially interesting for clinical practice

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-5-36

DO - https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-5-36

M3 - Article

C2 - 17605783

SN - 1477-7525

VL - 5

SP - 36

JO - Health and quality of life outcomes

JF - Health and quality of life outcomes

ER -