TY - JOUR
T1 - E-mental health implementation in inpatient care
T2 - Exploring its potential and future challenges
AU - Van Assche, E.
AU - Bonroy, B.
AU - Mertens, M.
AU - Van den Broeck, L.
AU - Desie, K.
AU - Bolinski, F.
AU - Amarti, K.
AU - Kleiboer, A.
AU - Riper, H.
AU - Van Daele, T.
N1 - Funding Information: The eMEN project received funding from the European Union's Interreg Northwest Europe programme. Acknowledgments Publisher Copyright: 2022 Van Assche, Bonroy, Mertens, Van den Broeck, Desie, Bolinski, Amarti, Kleiboer, Riper and Van Daele.
PY - 2022/12/14
Y1 - 2022/12/14
N2 - 2022 Van Assche, Bonroy, Mertens, Van den Broeck, Desie, Bolinski, Amarti, Kleiboer, Riper and Van Daele.Background: There is a great evidence base today for the effectiveness of e-mental health, or the use of technology in mental healthcare. However, large-scale implementation in mental healthcare organisations is lacking, especially in inpatient specialized mental healthcare settings. Aim: The current study aimed to gain insights into the factors that promote or hinder the implementation of e-mental health applications on organisational, professional and patient levels in Belgium. Methods: Four Belgian psychiatric hospitals and psychiatric departments of general hospitals invited their professionals and patients to use Moodbuster, which is a modular web-based platform with a connected smartphone application for monitoring. The platform was used in addition to treatment as usual for three to four months. The professionals and patients completed pre- and post-implementation questionnaires on their reasons to participate or to decline participation and experiences with the Moodbuster platform. Results: Main reasons for the organisations to participate in the implementation study were a general interest in e-mental health and seeing it is a helpful add-on to regular treatment. The actual use of Moodbuster by professionals and patients proved to be challenging with only 10 professionals and 24 patients participating. Implementation was hindered by technical difficulties and inpatient care specific factors such as lack of structural facilities to use e-mental health and patient-specific factors. Professionals saw value in using e-mental health applications for bridging the transition from inpatient to outpatient care. Twenty-two professionals and 31 patients completed the questionnaire on reasons not to participate. For the patients, lack of motivation because of too severe depressive symptoms was the most important reason not to participate. For professionals, it was lack of time and high workload. Conclusions: The current implementation study reveals several important barriers to overcome in order to successfully implement e-mental health in inpatient psychiatric care.
AB - 2022 Van Assche, Bonroy, Mertens, Van den Broeck, Desie, Bolinski, Amarti, Kleiboer, Riper and Van Daele.Background: There is a great evidence base today for the effectiveness of e-mental health, or the use of technology in mental healthcare. However, large-scale implementation in mental healthcare organisations is lacking, especially in inpatient specialized mental healthcare settings. Aim: The current study aimed to gain insights into the factors that promote or hinder the implementation of e-mental health applications on organisational, professional and patient levels in Belgium. Methods: Four Belgian psychiatric hospitals and psychiatric departments of general hospitals invited their professionals and patients to use Moodbuster, which is a modular web-based platform with a connected smartphone application for monitoring. The platform was used in addition to treatment as usual for three to four months. The professionals and patients completed pre- and post-implementation questionnaires on their reasons to participate or to decline participation and experiences with the Moodbuster platform. Results: Main reasons for the organisations to participate in the implementation study were a general interest in e-mental health and seeing it is a helpful add-on to regular treatment. The actual use of Moodbuster by professionals and patients proved to be challenging with only 10 professionals and 24 patients participating. Implementation was hindered by technical difficulties and inpatient care specific factors such as lack of structural facilities to use e-mental health and patient-specific factors. Professionals saw value in using e-mental health applications for bridging the transition from inpatient to outpatient care. Twenty-two professionals and 31 patients completed the questionnaire on reasons not to participate. For the patients, lack of motivation because of too severe depressive symptoms was the most important reason not to participate. For professionals, it was lack of time and high workload. Conclusions: The current implementation study reveals several important barriers to overcome in order to successfully implement e-mental health in inpatient psychiatric care.
KW - depression
KW - e-mental health
KW - implementation
KW - promoting and hindering factors
KW - psychiatric inpatient care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85145030968&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85145030968&origin=inward
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36588747
U2 - https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.1027864
DO - https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.1027864
M3 - Article
C2 - 36588747
SN - 2673-253X
VL - 4
JO - Frontiers in Digital Health
JF - Frontiers in Digital Health
M1 - 1027864
ER -