The Effect of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy with Instillation Compared to Current Standard Care on Wound Closure Time of Infected Wounds: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Infected wounds extend healing time and are associated with higher treatment costs than noninfected wounds. Several observational studies indicate that negative-pressure wound therapy with instillation can effectively reduce bacterial bioburden and improve wound healing. Only a few randomized trials with small sample sizes have been published, and a meta-analysis directly comparing negative-pressure wound therapy with instillation to current standard care is lacking. It is therefore uncertain whether negative-pressure wound therapy with instillation actually improves wound healing. The authors performed a systematic review and hypothesized that negative-pressure wound therapy with instillation reduces wound closure time.

METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched up to December of 2020 for English studies that compare negative-pressure wound therapy with instillation-to either negative-pressure wound therapy without instillation or to other types of wound care-for the treatment of acute or chronically infected wounds. Time to wound closure was analyzed using a random effects meta-analysis in predefined subgroups according to study design and comparative wound care.

RESULTS: The authors identified 14 studies describing 1053 patients. Meta-analysis of three randomized trials shows no significant difference in time to wound closure between negative-pressure wound therapy with instillation and that without (mean difference, 0.48 day; 95 percent CI, -0.70 to 1.65; I ² = 0 percent). Data from eleven observational studies indicate that negative-pressure wound therapy with instillation reduces wound closure time (from 1.6 to 16.8 days; no pooled data). Because of imprecision and risk of bias, the available evidence provides only low-level certainty.

CONCLUSIONS: There is currently insufficient evidence to support or discard the use of negative-pressure wound therapy with instillation for infected wounds. More randomized trials are needed to determine whether a beneficial effect can be substantiated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)176e-188e
JournalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume150
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2022

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy
  • Wound Healing
  • Wound Infection/therapy

Cite this