TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of Prior Therapy and Disease Refractoriness on the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Selinexor in Patients with Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)
T2 - A Post-hoc Analysis of the SADAL Study
AU - Schuster, Michael
AU - Zijlstra, Josée
AU - Casasnovas, Rene-Olivier
AU - Vermaat, Joost S. P.
AU - Kalakonda, Nagesh
AU - Goy, Andre
AU - Choquet, Sylvain
AU - Neste, Eric Van Den
AU - Hill, Brian
AU - Thieblemont, Catherine
AU - Cavallo, Federica
AU - de la Cruz, Fatima
AU - Kuruvilla, John
AU - Hamad, Nada
AU - Jaeger, Ulrich
AU - Caimi, Paolo
AU - Gurion, Ronit
AU - Warzocha, Krzysztof
AU - Bakhshi, Sameer
AU - Sancho, Juan-Manuel
AU - Follows, George
AU - Egyed, Miklos
AU - Offner, Fritz
AU - Vassilakopoulos, Theodoros
AU - Samal, Priyanka
AU - Ku, Matthew
AU - Ma, Xiwen
AU - Corona, Kelly
AU - Chamoun, Kamal
AU - Shah, Jatin
AU - Shacham, Sharon
AU - Kauffman, Michael G.
AU - Canales, Miguel
AU - Maerevoet, Marie
N1 - Funding Information: JetPub Scientific Communications, LLC supported by funding from Karyopharm, provided drafts and editorial assistance to the authors during preparation of this manuscript. Funding Information: AG reports personal fees and honoraria from AstraZeneca, personal fees and board membership from Cota and Kite/Gilead, personal fees from Janssen, Celgene, Acerta, and research funding from Constellation, Bayer, CALBG, Genentech, Hoffman-La Roche, MD Anderson, Morphosys, Pharmacyclics, and the University of Nebraska, outside the submitted work. Publisher Copyright: © 2021
PY - 2022/7
Y1 - 2022/7
N2 - Background: Despite a number of treatment options, patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) whose disease has become refractory to treatment have a poor prognosis. Selinexor is a novel, oral drug that is approved to treat patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL. In this post hoc analysis of the SADAL study, a multinational, open-label study, we evaluated subpopulations to determine if response to single agent selinexor is impacted by number of lines of prior treatment, autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), response to first and most recent therapies, and time to progressive disease. Patients: Patients (n = 134) with DLBCL after 2-5 prior therapies were enrolled in SADAL and received 60mg selinexor twice weekly. Results: The median overall survival was 9.0 months and median progression free survival was 2.6 months. Patients who had the best overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate were those who had prior ASCT (42.5% and 50.0%) or responded to last line of therapy (35.9% and 43.5%). Patients with primary refractory DLBCL also showed responses (ORR 21.8%). Adverse events between subgroups were similar to the overall study population, the most common being thrombocytopenia (29.1%), fatigue (7.5%), and nausea (6.0%). Conclusion: Regardless of prior therapy and disease refractory status, selinexor treatment demonstrated results consistent with its novel mechanism of action and lack of cross-resistance. Thus, single agent oral selinexor can induce deep, durable, and tolerable responses in patients with DLBCL who have recurrent disease after several chemoimmunotherapy combination regimens.
AB - Background: Despite a number of treatment options, patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) whose disease has become refractory to treatment have a poor prognosis. Selinexor is a novel, oral drug that is approved to treat patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL. In this post hoc analysis of the SADAL study, a multinational, open-label study, we evaluated subpopulations to determine if response to single agent selinexor is impacted by number of lines of prior treatment, autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), response to first and most recent therapies, and time to progressive disease. Patients: Patients (n = 134) with DLBCL after 2-5 prior therapies were enrolled in SADAL and received 60mg selinexor twice weekly. Results: The median overall survival was 9.0 months and median progression free survival was 2.6 months. Patients who had the best overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate were those who had prior ASCT (42.5% and 50.0%) or responded to last line of therapy (35.9% and 43.5%). Patients with primary refractory DLBCL also showed responses (ORR 21.8%). Adverse events between subgroups were similar to the overall study population, the most common being thrombocytopenia (29.1%), fatigue (7.5%), and nausea (6.0%). Conclusion: Regardless of prior therapy and disease refractory status, selinexor treatment demonstrated results consistent with its novel mechanism of action and lack of cross-resistance. Thus, single agent oral selinexor can induce deep, durable, and tolerable responses in patients with DLBCL who have recurrent disease after several chemoimmunotherapy combination regimens.
KW - Exportin-1
KW - Monotherapy
KW - Pretreated
KW - Refractory
KW - Relapsed
KW - SINE compounds
KW - XPO1
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123387099&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2021.12.016
DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2021.12.016
M3 - Article
C2 - 35078739
SN - 2152-2650
VL - 22
SP - 483
EP - 494
JO - Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma and Leukemia
JF - Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma and Leukemia
IS - 7
ER -