TY - JOUR
T1 - Effective and feasible interventions to improve structured EHR data registration and exchange
T2 - A concept mapping approach and exploration of practical examples in the Netherlands
AU - Klappe, E. S.
AU - Joukes, E.
AU - Cornet, R.
AU - de Keizer, N. F.
N1 - Funding Information: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Our study was funded by Amsterdam UMC 2019-AMC-JK-7. Amsterdam UMC did not have any role in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of the data, writing the report and the decision to submit the report for publication. Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s)
PY - 2023/5/1
Y1 - 2023/5/1
N2 - Background: Data in Electronic Health Records (EHRs) is often poorly structured and standardized, which hampers data reuse. Research described some examples of interventions to increase and improve structured and standardized data, such as guidelines and policies, training and user friendly EHR interfaces. However, little is known about the translation of this knowledge into practical solutions. Our study aimed to specify the most effective and feasible interventions that enable better structured and standardized EHR data registration and described practical examples of successfully implemented interventions. Methods: A concept mapping approach was used to determine feasible interventions that were considered to be effective or have been successfully implemented in Dutch hospitals. A focus group was held with Chief Medical Information Officers and Chief Nursing Information Officers. After interventions were determined, multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis were performed to categorize sorted interventions using Groupwisdom™, an online tool for concept mapping. Results are presented as Go-Zone plots and cluster maps. Following, semi-structured interviews were conducted to describe practical examples of successful interventions. Results: Interventions were classified into seven clusters ranked from highest to lowest perceived effectiveness: (1) education on usefulness and need; (2) strategic and (3) tactical organizational policies; (4) national policy; (5) monitoring and adjusting data (6) structure of and support from the EHR and (7) support in the registration process (EHR independent). Interviewees emphasized the following interventions proven successful in their practice: an enthusiastic ambassador per specialty who is responsible for educating peers by increasing awareness of the direct benefit of structured and standardized data registration; dashboards for continuous feedback on data quality; and EHR functionalities that support (automating) the registration process. Conclusions: Our study provided a list of effective and feasible interventions including practical examples of interventions that have been successful. Organizations should continue to share their best practices to learn from and attempted interventions to prevent implementation of ineffective interventions.
AB - Background: Data in Electronic Health Records (EHRs) is often poorly structured and standardized, which hampers data reuse. Research described some examples of interventions to increase and improve structured and standardized data, such as guidelines and policies, training and user friendly EHR interfaces. However, little is known about the translation of this knowledge into practical solutions. Our study aimed to specify the most effective and feasible interventions that enable better structured and standardized EHR data registration and described practical examples of successfully implemented interventions. Methods: A concept mapping approach was used to determine feasible interventions that were considered to be effective or have been successfully implemented in Dutch hospitals. A focus group was held with Chief Medical Information Officers and Chief Nursing Information Officers. After interventions were determined, multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis were performed to categorize sorted interventions using Groupwisdom™, an online tool for concept mapping. Results are presented as Go-Zone plots and cluster maps. Following, semi-structured interviews were conducted to describe practical examples of successful interventions. Results: Interventions were classified into seven clusters ranked from highest to lowest perceived effectiveness: (1) education on usefulness and need; (2) strategic and (3) tactical organizational policies; (4) national policy; (5) monitoring and adjusting data (6) structure of and support from the EHR and (7) support in the registration process (EHR independent). Interviewees emphasized the following interventions proven successful in their practice: an enthusiastic ambassador per specialty who is responsible for educating peers by increasing awareness of the direct benefit of structured and standardized data registration; dashboards for continuous feedback on data quality; and EHR functionalities that support (automating) the registration process. Conclusions: Our study provided a list of effective and feasible interventions including practical examples of interventions that have been successful. Organizations should continue to share their best practices to learn from and attempted interventions to prevent implementation of ineffective interventions.
KW - Concept mapping analysis
KW - Data reuse
KW - Electronic health records
KW - Healthcare interventions
KW - Implementation strategies
KW - Structured and standardized data registration
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85150900005&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105023
DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105023
M3 - Article
C2 - 36893655
SN - 1386-5056
VL - 173
JO - International Journal of Medical Informatics
JF - International Journal of Medical Informatics
M1 - 105023
ER -