Efficacy and safety of revisional treatments for weight regain or insufficient weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Rutger J. Franken, Josephine Franken, Nina R. Sluiter, Ralph de Vries, Sjoerd Euser, Victor E. A. Gerdes, Maurits de Brauw

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Weight regain or inadequate weight loss following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass poses a significant clinical challenge. Our objective was to evaluate various revisional techniques for addressing weight regain and insufficient weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass through a systematic review and meta-analysis. We performed a literature search (in PubMed and Embase) on revisional interventions in collaboration with a medical information specialist. Measured outcomes included body mass index at intervention, total weight loss during follow-up, and complications. Random effects models were used to determine pooled effect size and corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Thirty-nine studies were included: four studies reported on argon plasma coagulation, four studies on transoral outlet reduction, nine studies on transoral outlet reduction + argon plasma coagulation, four studies on pouch/gastrojejunal anastomosis revision, five on laparoscopic gastric banding, two studies on laparoscopic gastric banding + pouch resizing, 10 on distalization-RYGB, and one on duodenal switch. All techniques resulted in short-term clinically relevant weight loss. Endoscopic procedures had a short follow-up and resulted in modest and temporary weight loss. Surgical revision techniques were successful for weight loss in longer term follow-up, at the expense of high complication rates.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere13607
JournalObesity Reviews
Volume24
Issue number10
Early online date2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2023

Keywords

  • gastric bypass
  • insufficient weight loss
  • revision
  • weight regain

Cite this