Efficacy of neoadjuvant treatment with or without pertuzumab in patients with stage II and III HER2-positive breast cancer: a nationwide cohort analysis of pathologic response and 5-year survival

Anna van der Voort, Marte C. Liefaard, Mette S. van Ramshorst, Erik van Werkhoven, Joyce Sanders, Jelle Wesseling, Astrid Scholten, Marie Jeanne T. F. D. Vrancken Peeters, Linda de Munck, Sabine Siesling, Gabe S. Sonke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Pathologic complete response (pCR) rates in early stage HER2-positive breast cancer improved after pertuzumab was added to neoadjuvant treatment. However, survival benefit is less-well established and seems mostly limited to node-positive patients. We used national cancer registry data to compare outcomes of patients treated with and without pertuzumab. Methods: We identified stage II-III HER2-positive breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant trastuzumab-based chemotherapy between November 2013 until January 2016 from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. During that period pertuzumab was only available in the 37 hospitals that participated in the TRAIN-2 study. Missing grade and pCR-status were obtained from the Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA) and cause of death from Statistics Netherlands. We used multiple imputation to impute missing data, multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the association between pertuzumab and pCR (ypT0/is, ypN0) and multivariable Cox regression models for overall survival and breast cancer specific survival (BCSS). Results: We identified 1124 patients of whom 453 received pertuzumab. Baseline characteristics were comparable, although tumor grade was missing more often in patients treated without pertuzumab (12% vs. 2%). Pertuzumab improved pCR rates (41% vs 65%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.91; 95% CI:2.20–3.94). After a median follow-up of 6.0 years, 5-year BCSS rates were 95% and 98% respectively (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.58; 95% CI:0.36–0.95). Younger patients derived more benefit from pertuzumab, but no other significant interactions were found. Conclusion: These results support earlier data of a small survival benefit with the addition of pertuzumab to trastuzumab-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy which is most meaningful in younger patients.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)110-115
Number of pages6
JournalBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland)
Volume65
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2022

Keywords

  • ErbB2
  • HER2-Positive
  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • Non-metastatic breast cancer
  • Pertuzumab
  • Survival

Cite this