End-user perspectives on preventive antimalarials: A review of qualitative research

Lisanne Looman, Christopher Pell

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Antimalarials have been administered widely to prevent clinical malaria and researchers have explored how end-users’ perspectives influence uptake and adherence. Drawing on a systematic search, this review aims to synthesise qualitative research on end-user perceptions of antimalarials for disease prevention. Searches were undertaken in PubMed and ISI Web of Knowledge. After applying exclusion criteria, identified sources underwent thematic analysis. Identified sources were published between 2000 and 2020 and drew on studies undertaken across Africa, Asia, Europe, Oceania and America. The sources revealed end-user concerns about the potential benefits and harms of preventive treatment that are entwined with broader understandings of the disease, the intervention, its implementation, accompanying information, and how it is embedded in wider healthcare and social relationships. The implications for antimalarials as preventive therapy encompass the need to build trust, including interpersonal trust, engage diverse stakeholders and to address broader health and wellbeing concerns during implementation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)753-767
Number of pages15
JournalGlobal Public Health
Volume17
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Keywords

  • Malaria
  • end-users
  • prophylaxis
  • qualitative research
  • treatment as prevention

Cite this